Issue 15522: Page 139. Ambiguous multiplicities of associations (bpmn2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: Table 9.14. Row “innerConversationNodeRef”. 


In table 9.14 the multiplicity of model association “innerConversationNodeRef” is [0..1], but in Figure 9.31 (p. 139) its multiplicity is [1..1]. 
Its description in Table 9.14 (“This attribute defines the ConversationNodes of the referenced element...”) suggests that its multiplicity should be [0..*].


The multiplicity of  “innerConversationNodeRef” should be clearly defined ([0..1], or [1..1], or [0..*]). In case of [0..*] the model association name should be changed to “innerConversationNodeRefs”
---------------------------------------------


Table 9.14. Row “outerConversationNodeRef”. 


In table 9.14 the multiplicity of model association “outerConversationNodeRef” is [0..*], but in Figure 9.31 (p. 139) its multiplicity is [1..1]. 
Its description in Table 9.14 (“This attribute defines the ConversationNodes of the parent element...”) suggests that its multiplicity should be [0..*]. 


The multiplicity of  “outerConversationNodeRef” should be clearly defined ([1..1], or [0..*]). In case of [0..*] the model association name should be changed to “outerConversationNodeRefs”

Table 9.14 and Figure 9.31 should be updated accordingly.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 13, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 13 Sep 2010 00:05:29 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Eduardo Jara
Employer:        
mailFrom:        ejara@craftware.net
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   BPMN 2.0 Beta 2
Section:         9.4.7
FormalNumber:    dtc/2010-06-05
Version:         2.0
Doc_Year:        2010
Doc_Month:       June
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            139
Title:           Page 139. Ambiguous multiplicities of associations.
Nature:          Revision
Severity:        Significant
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


Table 9.14. Row .innerConversationNodeRef.. 


In table 9.14 the multiplicity of model association .innerConversationNodeRef. is [0..1], but in Figure 9.31 (p. 139) its multiplicity is [1..1]. 
Its description in Table 9.14 (.This attribute defines the ConversationNodes of the referenced element....) suggests that its multiplicity should be [0..*].


The multiplicity of  .innerConversationNodeRef. should be clearly defined ([0..1], or [1..1], or [0..*]). In case of [0..*] the model association name should be changed to .innerConversationNodeRefs.
---------------------------------------------


Table 9.14. Row .outerConversationNodeRef.. 


In table 9.14 the multiplicity of model association .outerConversationNodeRef. is [0..*], but in Figure 9.31 (p. 139) its multiplicity is [1..1]. 
Its description in Table 9.14 (.This attribute defines the ConversationNodes of the parent element....) suggests that its multiplicity should be [0..*]. 


The multiplicity of  .outerConversationNodeRef. should be clearly defined ([1..1], or [0..*]). In case of [0..*] the model association name should be changed to .outerConversationNodeRefs.

Table 9.14 and Figure 9.31 should be updated accordingly.