Issue 15547: Pages 312-457. Nonexistent attribute  “compensable” mentioned (bpmn2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: On page 312, it says: 
“It is possible to specify that a Sub-Process can be compensated without having to define the compensation handler. The Sub-Process attribute compensable, when set, specifies that default compensation is implicitly defined, which recursively compensates all successfully completed Activities within that Sub-Process.”


On page 457 (section 13.4.4), it says: 
“It is possible to specify that a Sub-Process can be compensated without having to define the compensation handler. The Sub-Process attribute compensable, when set, specifies that default compensation is implicitly defined, which recursively compensates all successfully completed Activities within that Sub-Process, invoking them in reverse order of their forward execution.”


The mentioned attribute “compensable” doesn’t appear in any Class Diagram or Table. In particular, Figure 10.29 and Table 10.20 (p.181), where the Sub-Process element is described.

These paragraphs should be removed; or the attribute “compensable” should be added in Table 10.20 and Figure 10.29.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 17, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 16 Sep 2010 22:12:26 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Eduardo Jara
Employer:        
mailFrom:        ejara@craftware.net
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   BPMN 2.0 Beta 2
Section:         10.6.1
FormalNumber:    dtc/2010-06-05
Version:         2.0
Doc_Year:        2010
Doc_Month:       June
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            312, 457
Title:           Pages 312-457. Nonexistent attribute  .compensable. mentioned
Nature:          Revision
Severity:        Significant
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


On page 312, it says: 
.It is possible to specify that a Sub-Process can be compensated without having to define the compensation handler. The Sub-Process attribute compensable, when set, specifies that default compensation is implicitly defined, which recursively compensates all successfully completed Activities within that Sub-Process..


On page 457 (section 13.4.4), it says: 
.It is possible to specify that a Sub-Process can be compensated without having to define the compensation handler. The Sub-Process attribute compensable, when set, specifies that default compensation is implicitly defined, which recursively compensates all successfully completed Activities within that Sub-Process, invoking them in reverse order of their forward execution..


The mentioned attribute .compensable. doesn.t appear in any Class Diagram or Table. In particular, Figure 10.29 and Table 10.20 (p.181), where the Sub-Process element is described.

These paragraphs should be removed; or the attribute .compensable. should be added in Table 10.20 and Figure 10.29.