Issue 15551: Page 341. Choreography Activity instead of Task (bpmn2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
Summary: It says:
“The three (3) or more partitions in the Sub-Choreography shape provide the distinction between this type of Task and an Orchestration Sub-Process (in a traditional BPMN diagram).”


A Sub-Choreography is not a “type of Task”, but it is a “type of Choreography Activity”.


Then, it should say: 
“The three (3) or more partitions in the Sub-Choreography shape provide the distinction between this type of Choreography Activity and an Orchestration Sub-Process (in a traditional BPMN diagram).”
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 17, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 16 Sep 2010 22:27:05 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Eduardo Jara
Employer:        
mailFrom:        ejara@craftware.net
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   BPMN 2.0 Beta 2
Section:         11.4.2
FormalNumber:    dtc/2010-06-05
Version:         2.0
Doc_Year:        2010
Doc_Month:       June
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            341
Title:           Page 341. Choreography Activity instead of Task
Nature:          Revision
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


It says:
.The three (3) or more partitions in the Sub-Choreography shape provide the distinction between this type of Task and an Orchestration Sub-Process (in a traditional BPMN diagram)..


A Sub-Choreography is not a .type of Task., but it is a .type of Choreography Activity..


Then, it should say: 
.The three (3) or more partitions in the Sub-Choreography shape provide the distinction between this type of Choreography Activity and an Orchestration Sub-Process (in a traditional BPMN diagram)..