Issue 15608: MOF 2 should merge UML 2 (merged) as opposed to Kernel (mof2core-rtf) Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: MOF 2 should merge UML 2 (merged) as opposed to Kernel and use the automated constraints from UML 2.4 production. Since UML2 now has a normative merged metamodel it makes sense to reference this – especially since Kernel will be disappearing at UML 2.5. The UML 2.4 team has produced a more complete set of executable constraints for valid MOF 2.4 metamodels which should be incorporated. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 21, 2010: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== ubject: New issue for MOF 2 Core RTF Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:26:38 -0700 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: New issue for MOF 2 Core RTF Thread-Index: ActZjr3kmVzc0I0aQya+BqPvmgRwJQ== From: "Pete Rivett" To: MOF 2 should merge UML 2 (merged) as opposed to Kernel and use the automated constraints from UML 2.4 production. Since UML2 now has a normative merged metamodel it makes sense to reference this . especially since Kernel will be disappearing at UML 2.5. The UML 2.4 team has produced a more complete set of executable constraints for valid MOF 2.4 metamodels which should be incorporated. -- Pete Rivett (pete.rivett@adaptive.com) CTO, Adaptive Inc 65 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 cell: +1 949 338 3794 Follow me on Twitter @rivettp or http://twitter.com/rivettp