Issue 15622: UML 2.4 - Interaction (uml2-rtf)
Source: The MathWorks (Mr. Alan Moore, alan.moore(at)mathworks.co.uk)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: In the semantics section of MessageEnd it says “Subclasses of MessageEnd define the specific semantics appropriate to the concept they represent.”

 

However, in the semantics section of MessageOccurrenceSpecification, a subclass of MessageEnd,  it says “No additional semantics”

 

So it’s not clear what the semantics of MessageOccurrenceSpecification are.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 21, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: Alan Moore <Alan.Moore@mathworks.co.uk>
To: "issues@omg.org" <issues@omg.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:38:02 +0100
Subject: UML 2.4 - Interaction
Thread-Topic: UML 2.4 - Interaction
Thread-Index: ActZmpg6+rQjWCwdS0CSGgpPHj3hcg==
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB


In the semantics section of MessageEnd it says .Subclasses of MessageEnd define the specific semantics appropriate to the concept they represent..

 

However, in the semantics section of MessageOccurrenceSpecification, a subclass of MessageEnd,  it says .No additional semantics.

 

So it.s not clear what the semantics of MessageOccurrenceSpecification are.