Issue 15722:  Incorrect multiplicity of dataStoreRef (bpmn2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: i) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 211. Figure 10.50.
Role dataObjectRef (from DataObjectReference to DataObject) has multiplicity [1..1].
Role dataStoreRef (from DataStoreReference to DataStore) has multiplicity [0..1].  


ii) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 212. Figure 10.51.
Role dataObjectRef (from DataObjectReference to DataObject) has multiplicity [1..1].


iii) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 213. Table 10.53. Row “dataObjectRef”. It says:
    “dataObjectRef: DataObject”
     It means that dataObjectRef  is mandatory (multiplicity [1..1]).


iv) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 216. Figure 10.55.
Role dataStoreRef (from DataStoreReference to DataStore) has multiplicity [0..1].  


v) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 217. Table 10.56. Row “dataStoreRef”. It says:
    “dataStoreRef: DataStore”
     It means that dataStoreRef  is mandatory (multiplicity [1..1]).



COMMENTS:


In (i) and (iv) dataStoreRef  is optional ([0..1])., but in (v) it is said that dataStoreRef  is mandatory ([1..1]). Clearly there is contradiction concerning the multiplicity of dataStoreRef. Furthermore, a question arises: How can a DataStoreReference exist without a referenced DataStore? 



SUGGESTIONS:


It seems that dataStoreRef should be mandatory (multiplicity [1..1]), if this is the case:


In (i) and (iv) change multiplicity of dataStoreRef from [0..1] to  [1..1]

(ii), (iii) and (v) don’t require modifications.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
October 11, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 11 Oct 2010 23:31:16 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Eduardo Jara
Employer:        
mailFrom:        ejara@craftware.net
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   BPMN 2.0 Beta 2
Section:         10.3.1
FormalNumber:    dtc/2010-06-05
Version:         2.0
Doc_Year:        2010
Doc_Month:       June
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            211
Title:           Incorrect multiplicity of dataStoreRef
Nature:          Revision
Severity:        Significant
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


ANTECEDENTS:


i) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 211. Figure 10.50.
Role dataObjectRef (from DataObjectReference to DataObject) has multiplicity [1..1].
Role dataStoreRef (from DataStoreReference to DataStore) has multiplicity [0..1].  


ii) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 212. Figure 10.51.
Role dataObjectRef (from DataObjectReference to DataObject) has multiplicity [1..1].


iii) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 213. Table 10.53. Row .dataObjectRef.. It says:
    .dataObjectRef: DataObject.
     It means that dataObjectRef  is mandatory (multiplicity [1..1]).


iv) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 216. Figure 10.55.
Role dataStoreRef (from DataStoreReference to DataStore) has multiplicity [0..1].  


v) Chapter/Section 10.3.1. Page 217. Table 10.56. Row .dataStoreRef.. It says:
    .dataStoreRef: DataStore.
     It means that dataStoreRef  is mandatory (multiplicity [1..1]).



COMMENTS:


In (i) and (iv) dataStoreRef  is optional ([0..1])., but in (v) it is said that dataStoreRef  is mandatory ([1..1]). Clearly there is contradiction concerning the multiplicity of dataStoreRef. Furthermore, a question arises: How can a DataStoreReference exist without a referenced DataStore? 



SUGGESTIONS:


It seems that dataStoreRef should be mandatory (multiplicity [1..1]), if this is the case:


In (i) and (iv) change multiplicity of dataStoreRef from [0..1] to  [1..1]

(ii), (iii) and (v) don.t require modifications.