Issue 15730: SysML Issue representation of properties as associations (sysml-rtf) Source: Change Vision (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, mjchonoles(at)yahoo.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: In UML, there appears to be consistent representing of attributes as regular associations from the owning class. SysML, in similar circumstances, represents value properties as composite associations. We should try to understand what UML is saying (and perhaps push back on them) and consider the value of consistency. Resolution: Defer Postponed to the next RTF Revised Text: Actions taken: October 14, 2010: received issue January 3, 2017: Deferred April 6, 2017: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== te: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:00:55 -0400 From: "Chonoles, Michael J" Subject: SysML Issue representation of properties as associations To: "sysml-rtf@omg.org" , Juergen Boldt Thread-Topic: SysML Issue representation of properties as associations Thread-Index: ActqVLpL92aP90IZSo2D/rLSFWyZfAAAQEdg Accept-Language: en-US acceptlanguage: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {6790835B-BA8D-40EA-BFDF-19F4773A86A4} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AwQY DyvN GnyE GzAB J6v2 Kgqc MbPT NNAN Pymw QLsE RCHC SHLK TRrY Tyfs Wfi7 W3XG;2;agB1AGUAcgBnAGUAbgBAAG8AbQBnAC4AbwByAGcAOwBzAHkAcwBtAGwALQByAHQAZgBAAG8AbQBnAC4AbwByAGcA;Sosha1_v1;7;{6790835B-BA8D-40EA-BFDF-19F4773A86A4};bQBpAGMAaABhAGUAbAAuAGoALgBjAGgAbwBuAG8AbABlAHMAQABsAG0AYwBvAC4AYwBvAG0A;Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:41:06 GMT;UwB5AHMATQBMACAASQBzAHMAdQBlACAAcgBlAHAAcgBlAHMAZQBuAHQAYQB0AGkAbwBuACAAbwBmACAAcAByAG8AcABlAHIAdABpAGUAcwAgAGEAcwAgAGEAcwBzAG8AYwBpAGEAdABpAG8AbgBzAA== X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-14_07:2010-10-14,2010-10-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 In UML, there appears to be consistent representing of attributes as regular associations from the owning class. SysML, in similar circumstances, represents value properties as composite associations. We should try to understand what UML is saying (and perhaps push back on them) and consider the value of consistency. Michael