Issue 15765: stereotype <<bind>> for defining parameterized classes is nowhere defined (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Usage of <<bind>> to define parameterized classes in object diagrams is nowhere defined in the UML specification. Not as a keyword in Annex B (p. 707) and also not as a standard stereotype (Annex C, p. 713). I just wondered what the actual definition of <<bind>> may be. Maybe it would be good to define it somewhere. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: October 19, 2010: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 19 Oct 2010 12:31:11 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Bernhard Hoisl Employer: Vienna University of Economics and Business mailFrom: bernhard.hoisl@wu.ac.at Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure Section: 17.5.7 FormalNumber: formal/2010-05-05 Version: 2.3 Doc_Year: 2010 Doc_Month: May Doc_Day: 05 Page: 651 Title: stereotype <> for defining parameterized classes is nowhere defined Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Description: Usage of <> to define parameterized classes in object diagrams is nowhere defined in the UML specification. Not as a keyword in Annex B (p. 707) and also not as a standard stereotype (Annex C, p. 713). I just wondered what the actual definition of <> may be. Maybe it would be good to define it somewhere. Subject: RE: issue 15765 -- UML 2 RTF issue Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:20:46 -0400 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: issue 15765 -- UML 2 RTF issue Thread-Index: ActvuxyFfT5m3YT5She/3MWT14zWgQAGAgow From: "Ed Seidewitz" To: "Juergen Boldt" , , Cc: The use of the «bind» keyword (it is not a stereotype) is defined in the notation section of Subclause 17.5.3 TemplateBinding of the UML 2.3 specification, so it is defined .somewhere. in the spec. It is not included in Table B.1 in Annex B, however, which is an error. -- Ed -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 2:14 PM To: issues@omg.org; uml2-rtf@omg.org Cc: bernhard.hoisl@wu.ac.at Subject: issue 15765 -- UML 2 RTF issue From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 19 Oct 2010 12:31:11 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Bernhard Hoisl Employer: Vienna University of Economics and Business mailFrom: bernhard.hoisl@wu.ac.at Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure Section: 17.5.7 FormalNumber: formal/2010-05-05 Version: 2.3 Doc_Year: 2010 Doc_Month: May Doc_Day: 05 Page: 651 Title: stereotype <> for defining parameterized classes is nowhere defined Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Description: Usage of <> to define parameterized classes in object diagrams is nowhere defined in the UML specification. Not as a keyword in Annex B (p. 707) and also not as a standard stereotype (Annex C, p. 713). I just wondered what the actual definition of <> may be. Maybe it would be good to define it somewhere. Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org