Issue 1577: Section 7.1.3 of Java to IDL mapping (java-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Summary: Section 7.1.3 of the Java to IDL mapping specifies new methods _request, _invoke, and _releaseReply to be added to both org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl and org.omg.CORBA.portable.Delegate. There is an existing convention that methods on ObjectImpl have leading underscores but the corresponding methods on Delegate do not. I propose that the new methods on Delegate be named request, invoke, and releaseReply to confirm to this existing convention. Resolution: closed issue Revised Text: Actions taken: June 24, 1998: received issue July 30, 1998: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Return-Path: Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 12:00:56 +0100 From: Simon Nash Reply-To: nash@hursley.ibm.com Organization: IBM To: java2idl-rtf@omg.org Cc: java-rtf@omg.org, issues@omg.org Subject: Delegate method names should not have underscores This item affects the Java-to-IDL spec, but is also of concern to the IDL-to-Java RTF because it relates to the new portability stub APIs. Section 7.1.3 of the Java to IDL mapping specifies new methods _request, _invoke, and _releaseReply to be added to both org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl and org.omg.CORBA.portable.Delegate. There is an existing convention that methods on ObjectImpl have leading underscores but the corresponding methods on Delegate do not. I propose that the new methods on Delegate be named request, invoke, and releaseReply to confirm to this existing convention. Simon -- Simon C Nash, IBM Java Technology Centre, Hursley, UK MailPoint 146, x245156 Tel. 01962 815156 or +44-1962-815156 Internet: nash@hursley.ibm.com Notes mail: Simon Nash@ibmgb