Issue 15829: Revise conventions to avoid unnecessary duplication of descriptions for operations (mof2core-rtf)
Source: NASA (Dr. Nicolas F. Rouquette, nicolas.f.rouquette(at)jpl.nasa.gov)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Revise the conventions used in the MOF specification document to avoid unnecessary duplication of descriptions for inherited operations.
in particular, the add/addAll/remove operations in 10.7 ReflectiveSequence are unnecessary duplicate descriptions of the add/addAll/remove operations inherited from 10.6 ReflectiveCollection
Resolution: Compared to the UML2 specifications, documenting inherited operations is unusual. More importantly, the MOF2.0 Core specification document lacks a clause documenting the specification and diagram formats used; however, this issue is beyond the scope of the MOF2.4 RTF. 
Disposition: Deferred

Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
November 22, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 15829	From: "Rouquette, Nicolas F (316A)" <nicolas.f.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov>


Revise conventions to avoid unnecessary duplication of descriptions for operations

Revise the conventions used in the MOF specification document to avoid unnecessary duplication of descriptions for inherited operations.
in particular, the add/addAll/remove operations in 10.7 ReflectiveSequence are unnecessary duplicate descriptions of the add/addAll/remove operations inherited from 10.6 ReflectiveCollection