Issue 16031: In the OWL metamodel the Restriction Cardinality elements should own their TypedLiteral (odm-rtf)
Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: In the OWL metamodel the Restriction Cardinality elements should own their TypedLiteral (i.e. the associations Cardinality, MaxCardinality, MinCardinality should be composite)

Resolution: 
Resolved through 19071
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 16, 2011: received issue
April 25, 2014: closed issue
April 25, 2014: closed issue
Discussion: 
The metamodel for Restrictions has been revised and redrawn as a result of issue 19071. That addresses this issue also.


End of Annotations:=====
ubject: Issues on ODM metamodel
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:07:01 -0800
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Issues on ODM metamodel
Thread-Index: AcvODJGE0bKWyV4TTVamVfqNduRiaQ==
From: "Pete Rivett" <pete.rivett@adaptive.com>
To: <issues@omg.org>
Cc: <ekendall@sandsoft.com>, <evan.wallace@nist.gov>,
        <nicolas.f.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov>


I.d appreciate early feedback on these, especially the following where I.m less sure of my ground: 6, 9.

In the OWL metamodel the Restriction Cardinality elements should own their TypedLiteral

In the OWL metamodel the Restriction Cardinality elements should own their TypedLiteral (i.e. the associations Cardinality, MaxCardinality, MinCardinality should be composite)