Issue 16038: derived Association OWLBase::/TripleForGraph (odm-rtf) Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: It’s unclear how derived Association OWLBase::/TripleForGraph is supposed to interact/be merged with underived RDFBase::TripleForGraph. There seems no need for a derived OWLGraph::/triple when OWLGraph inherits triple from RDFGraph. Or is it the intent that OWLGraph::triple {redefines RDFGraph::triple} – in which case that should be stated along with how it would be derived: via OWLGraph::ontology and Ontology::triple? And is it the intent that Triple has both a derived /owlGraph and a (non-derived) graph property? In which case the former should {subset} the latter and the derivation should be expressed. Resolution: 1. In section 11.2.1 remove “OWLGraph” from the following clause: Exceptions to this convention include OWLUniverse, OWLGraph, and OWLStatement, 2. In Figure 11.2 remove OWLGraph, and the lines to it. Also remove RDFGraph which has no purpose in this diagram 3. Remove section 11.2.1, OWLGraph 4. In section 11.2.2, OWLOntology: Remove the first association: owlGraph: OWLGraph [1..*] in association GraphForOntology - links an ontology to one or more graphs containing the triples that define it. Remove all 4 constraints [1] through [4]. 5. Remove section 11.2.4 Triple (Augmented Definition) Revised Text: Actions taken: February 16, 2011: received issue April 25, 2014: closed issue Discussion: This association is not needed; neither is OWLGraph needed as a specialization of RDFGraph End of Annotations:===== ubject: Issues on ODM metamodel Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:07:01 -0800 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Issues on ODM metamodel Thread-Index: AcvODJGE0bKWyV4TTVamVfqNduRiaQ== From: "Pete Rivett" To: Cc: , , I.d appreciate early feedback on these, especially the following where I.m less sure of my ground: 6, 9. This is issue # 16038 derived Association OWLBase::/TripleForGraph