Issue 16040: Spec is sorely in need of examples showing how to represent common RDF/OWL constructs as instances of metamodel (odm-rtf)
Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary:  The specification is sorely in need of examples showing how to represent common RDF/OWL constructs as instances of the metamodel. That’s especially the case for use of URIs and IDs; and also for anonymous classes as used in Restrictions and Intersections
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 16, 2011: received issue
Discussion: 
The RTF recognizes the importance of providing examples. However, RTF effort for version 1.1 concentrated on revising and improving the metamodels, Given the metamodels’ evolving nature during the past year, producing examples was judged risky, as an example construct might soon be out of date. Resolutions against issue 16040 are deferred until RTF 1.2.
Disposition:	Deferred
End of Annotations:=====
ubject: Issues on ODM metamodel
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:07:01 -0800
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Issues on ODM metamodel
Thread-Index: AcvODJGE0bKWyV4TTVamVfqNduRiaQ==
From: "Pete Rivett" <pete.rivett@adaptive.com>
To: <issues@omg.org>
Cc: <ekendall@sandsoft.com>, <evan.wallace@nist.gov>,
        <nicolas.f.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov>


I.d appreciate early feedback on these, especially the following where I.m less sure of my ground: 6, 9.

This is issue # 16040

Spec is sorely in need of examples showing how to represent common RDF/OWL constructs as instances of metamodel

 The specification is sorely in need of examples showing how to represent common RDF/OWL constructs as instances of the metamodel. That.s especially the case for use of URIs and IDs; and also for anonymous classes as used in Restrictions and Intersections