Issue 16049: Procedure not defined (bpmn2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: The word procedure(s) is used 4 times in the document. It is not defined anywhere.  Surely all instances of procedure should read "process".
Otherwise it would be consistent to provide a definition of Procedure in Annex C
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 10, 2011: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 10 Mar 2011 01:42:41 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            John Raper
Employer:        Telstra Coorporation
mailFrom:        john.raper@team.telstra.com
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN)
Section:         OMG.s Issue Reporting Procedure
FormalNumber:    formal/2011-01-03
Version:         2.0
Doc_Year:        2011
Doc_Month:       January
Doc_Day:         03
Page:            5,51,51,107
Title:           Procedure not defined
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


The word procedure(s) is used 4 times in the document. It is not defined anywhere.  Surely all instances of procedure should read "process".
Otherwise it would be consistent to provide a definition of Procedure in Annex C