Issue 16065: There are several (seven to be precise) cases where {subsets} relationships are represented in the XMI as Constraints (soaml-rtf)
Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: There are several (seven to be precise) cases where {subsets} relationships are represented in the XMI as Constraints rather than using the subsettedProperty association. 

In fact one of the Constraints does not have a constrainedElement. 

There are also two cases where {redefines} is represented by a Constraint in the XMI.

However many of these have other problems (see other issues).


Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 4, 2011: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Issues on SoaML
Thread-Index: AcvaziZ+R3SVltO9Tcib4lY75bEuUA==
From: "Pete Rivett" <pete.rivett@adaptive.com>
To: <issues@omg.org>
Cc: <Arne.J.Berre@sintef.no>, <jamsden@us.ibm.com>, <nerijus@nomagic.com>

re several (seven to be precise) cases where {subsets} relationships are represented in the XMI as Constraints

There are several (seven to be precise) cases where {subsets} relationships are represented in the XMI as Constraints rather than using the subsettedProperty association. 

In fact one of the Constraints does not have a constrainedElement. 

There are also two cases where {redefines} is represented by a Constraint in the XMI.

However many of these have other problems (see other issues).