Issue 16101: Explicitness of Representation (sbvr-rtf) Source: Business Rule Solutions, LLC (Mr. Ron Ross, rross(at)brsolutions.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Problem Description: The signifier "Explicitness of Representation" for a categorization scheme in SBVR 11.1.3 is not intuitive, and the reason for the choice is not explained. Explicitness of Representation Definition: the categorization scheme of the concept definition that classifies a definition based on whether it is owned by its speech community or adopted by its speech community Resolution: Change the signifier for the concept to "Origin". Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: March 28, 2011: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== hoo-Newman-Id: 726301.74088.bm@omp1058.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-SMTP: MhfrpU2swBDLgYiYhNQDHBu0cE4o.vu2We1FRN9o X-YMail-OSG: Urqojk4VM1lKxZbgbEoLYWjqSHkR5Ax6j71PGTUDvYaQN7n .kE6nmF9FAIgOdacbmBy7SlBLnL3jjW3SHHjEf6VF9gkkLMt2DQ2OSAf1wL8 g09JrFfzARl1NuaMKN_9ZaLLLqoj51_dUygVj7oDJpHNFUO3WvAIJaaR414K 3lznsYc5E.R8EPzkduTiIp1Nv4PDKUxat6a4ya1iE2iaSfko5O4shNcOPaPv zJeWgMJsJY30_XM_L_AkhhO3n6LYY_BzIsRXKx3HWO2se2bOTcOGYm52a4x9 52iR4CH46glpzqpeI.y.Wc8FIJkKjxd5DAejGwZ33jpxp6KCkYw_GPHMv8Wc - X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:30:24 -0500 To: Juergen Boldt From: "Ronald G. Ross" Subject: New Issue: Fwd: question about SBVR 11.1.3 Juergen, Could you please post this as an issue for SBVR? Thanks, Ron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Issue: Explicitness of Representation Problem Description: The signifier "Explicitness of Representation" for a categorization scheme in SBVR 11.1.3 is not intuitive, and the reason for the choice is not explained. Explicitness of Representation Definition: the categorization scheme of the concept definition that classifies a definition based on whether it is owned by its speech community or adopted by its speech community Resolution: Change the signifier for the concept to "Origin". X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-15_08:2011-04-15,2011-04-15,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104150154 Subject: Re: issue 16101 -- SBVR RTF issue - Resolution From: keri Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:42:09 -1000 Cc: issues@omg.org To: sbvr-rtf@omg.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) All, Ron prepared the attached Word document, based on today's discussion; I added the modified diagram. I have also attached the source image file (.eps), which Linda will need. Regards, Keri On Apr 6, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Juergen Boldt wrote: >> >> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:30:24 -0500 >> To: Juergen Boldt >> From: "Ronald G. Ross" >> Subject: New Issue: Fwd: question about SBVR 11.1.3 >> >> Juergen, Could you please post this as an issue for SBVR? >> >> Thanks, >> Ron >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Issue: Explicitness of Representation >> >> Problem Description: The signifier "Explicitness of Representation" for a categorization scheme in SBVR 11.1.3 is not intuitive, and the reason for the choice is not explained. >> >> Explicitness of Representation >> Definition: the categorization scheme of the concept definition that classifies a definition based on whether it is owned by its speech community or adopted by its speech community >> >> Resolution: Change the signifier for the concept to "Origin". All, Ron prepared the attached Word document, based on today's discussion; I added the modified diagram. I have also attached the source image file (.eps), which Linda will need. Regards, Keri SBVR Issue 16101 Resolution v2.doc SBVR Issue 16101 Resolution v2.eps On Apr 6, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Juergen Boldt wrote: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:30:24 -0500 To: Juergen Boldt From: "Ronald G. Ross" Subject: New Issue: Fwd: question about SBVR 11.1.3 Juergen, Could you please post this as an issue for SBVR? Thanks, Ron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Issue: Explicitness of Representation Problem Description: The signifier "Explicitness of Representation" for a categorization scheme in SBVR 11.1.3 is not intuitive, and the reason for the choice is not explained. Explicitness of Representation Definition: the categorization scheme of the concept definition that classifies a definition based on whether it is owned by its speech community or adopted by its speech community Resolution: Change the signifier for the concept to "Origin". Disposition: Resolved OMG Issue No: 16101 Title: Explicitness of Representation Source: Ronald G. Ross, Business Rule Solutions, LLC, rross@BRSolutions.com Summary: The signifier "Explicitness of Representation" for a categorization scheme in SBVR 11.1.3 is not intuitive, and the reason for the choice is not explained. Explicitness of Representation Definition: the categorization scheme of the concept definition that classifies a definition based on whether it is owned by its speech community or adopted by its speech community Resolution: Change the signifier "Explicitness of Representation" to .Definition Origin.. Revised Text: REMOVE from Clause 11.1.3 (PDF pg. 150, Figure 11.3): and REPLACE with: REMOVE from Clause 11.1.3 (PDF pg. 151, the entry currently named "Explicitness of Representation") the entry term: Explicitness of Representation and REPLACE with: Definition Origin REMOVE from Clause 11.1.3 (PDF pg. 151, the entry currently named "owned definition") the Necessity: Necessity: The concept 'owned definition' is included in Explicitness of Representation. and REPLACE with: Necessity: The concept 'owned definition' is included in Definition Origin. REMOVE from Clause 11.1.3 (PDF pg. 151, the entry currently named "adopted definition") the 1st Necessity: Necessity: The concept 'adopted definition' is included in Explicitness of Representation. and REPLACE with: Necessity: The concept 'adopted definition' is included in Definition Origin. Disposition: Resolved