Issue 16138: Japan PAS Ballot Comment 15 (ocl2-rtf) Section 8.3.5 Fig8.7 & following class description (p50-p51) (ocl2-rtf)
Source:  (Mr. Tom Rutt, nobody)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: The class diagram on Fig8.6 & Fig8.7 and its class description is inconsistent. For example, there is TupleLIteralPart on the class diagram. However, there is no class description in p51. Additionally, as class description of CollectionLiteralPart, Associations describes “type”. Furthermore, PrimitiveLiteralExp doesn’t have any attributes on the class diagram (Fig 8.6). However, followed class description, p51, Attribute “symbol” is described. And, there is a referredEnumLiteral as class description. However, class diagram doesn’t have referredEnumLiteral on Fig. 8.6. PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Correct class diagram and its class description
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 20, 2011: received issue
Discussion: 
See comment JP 21 in “…_JISC.doc”  file in http://www.omg.org/members/cgi-bin/doc?pas/11-03-03.zip
End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 16138

Japan PAS Ballot Comment 15 (ocl2-rtf) Section 8.3.5 Fig8.7 & following class description (p50-p51)

The class diagram on Fig8.6 & Fig8.7 and its class description is inconsistent. For example, there is TupleLIteralPart on the class diagram. However, there is no class description in p51. Additionally, as class description of CollectionLiteralPart, Associations describes .type.. Furthermore, PrimitiveLiteralExp doesn.t have any attributes on the class diagram (Fig 8.6). However, followed class description, p51, Attribute .symbol. is described. And, there is a referredEnumLiteral as class description. However, class diagram doesn.t have referredEnumLiteral on Fig. 8.6. PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Correct class diagram and its class description