Issue 16307: A deferrable trigger may have a guard (uml2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: It is an unfortunate restriction to omit guards from the specification of <trigger>/defer.

Please explicitly state or reconsider this restriction since using a guard would simplify many scenarios involving event deferral
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
June 1, 2011: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 01 Jun 2011 19:01:26 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Joe Mooney
Employer:        General Dynamics
mailFrom:        joe.mooney@asu.edu
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Superstructure specification
Section:         15.3.14
FormalNumber:    ptc/2010-11-14
Version:         2.4
Doc_Year:        2011
Doc_Month:       November
Doc_Day:         14
Page:            594
Title:           A deferrable trigger may have a guard
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


It is an unfortunate restriction to omit guards from the specification of <trigger>/defer.

Please explicitly state or reconsider this restriction since using a guard would simplify many scenarios involving event deferral.