Issue 16313: SBVR should be available in SACM for use wherever this would make sense (sacm-rtf)
Source: MITRE (Mr. Samuel Redwine, samredwine(at)verizon.net)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Critical
Summary: SBVR should be available in SACM for use wherever this would make sense. This includes in (ARM) claims and ReasoningElements and in SAEM many assertions particularly claims and possible rationales. Wherever narrative or prose, or mathematical expressions are allowed, why not also allow SBVR (and some places graphics or even other media also) unless strong reasons exist for doing otherwise?
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
June 5, 2011: received issue
Discussion: 
This is a valid suggestion, however due to the lack of time any further discussion on this issue is deferred to
the future RTF.
Disposition: Deferred
End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 05 Jun 2011 12:24:10 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Samuel T. Redwine, Jr.
Employer:        Sam Redwine Consulting
mailFrom:        samredwine@ieee.org
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   Software Assurance Evidence Metamodel (SAEM)
Section:         All
FormalNumber:    ptc/2010-08-37
Version:         FTF - Beta 1 
Doc_Year:        2010
Doc_Month:       August
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            All
Title:           SBVR should be available in SACM for use wherever this would make sense
Nature:          Revision
Severity:        Critical
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:

SBVR should be available in SACM for use wherever this would make sense. This includes in (ARM) claims and ReasoningElements and in SAEM many assertions particularly claims and possible rationales. Wherever narrative or prose, or mathematical expressions are allowed, why not also allow SBVR (and some places graphics or even other media also) unless strong reasons exist for doing otherwise?