Issue 16362: Core Package versus Construct Package (uml2-rtf)
Source: Visionnaire (Mr. Sergio Mainetti, Jr., mainetti(at)visionnaire.com.br)
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Significant
Summary: On page 14, Figure 7.3 of the OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), 
Infrastructure document, I think there's a small error in the picture.


The picture details the Core package, as explained in the text. But
the name in the top of the package is written as "Construct" (please
note that I'm talking about the name of the whole package, the left-
hand side one in the picture, and not the name os the sub-package 
Construct itself).


It gets a little bit confusing that the name of the whole package
is written as "Construct" instead of "Core".


Please note also that the Figure "Part II, Figure 2" on page 27 is
the same. And Figure 9.1 on page 29. And Figure 10.1 on page 91. And
11.1 on page 103. And maybe others that I couldn't find now.



Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 8, 2011: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 08 Jul 2011 13:34:03 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Sergio Mainetti Jr.
Employer:        Visionnaire
mailFrom:        mainetti@visionnaire.com.br
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Infrastructure
Section:         7.3
FormalNumber:    ptc/2010-11-16
Version:         Version 2.4
Doc_Year:        2011
Doc_Month:       January
Doc_Day:         01
Page:            14
Title:           Core Package versus Construct Package
Nature:          Enhancement
Severity:        Significant
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:



On page 14, Figure 7.3 of the OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), 
Infrastructure document, I think there's a small error in the picture.


The picture details the Core package, as explained in the text. But
the name in the top of the package is written as "Construct" (please
note that I'm talking about the name of the whole package, the left-
hand side one in the picture, and not the name os the sub-package 
Construct itself).


It gets a little bit confusing that the name of the whole package
is written as "Construct" instead of "Core".


Please note also that the Figure "Part II, Figure 2" on page 27 is
the same. And Figure 9.1 on page 29. And Figure 10.1 on page 91. And
11.1 on page 103. And maybe others that I couldn't find now.



Best regards,


Sergio Mainetti Jr.
mainetti@visionnaire.com.br