Issue 16475: ActivityDefinition and OperationDefinition Bodies (alf-rtf)
Source: Ivar Jacobson International AB (Mr. Ed Seidewitz, eseidewitz(at)ivarjacobson.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Subclauses: 15.2.2 ActivityDefinition and 15.2.16 OperationDefinition

OperationDefinition and ActivityDefinition should have derived attributes for their actual body that gets the subunit body if they are stubs (in all other cases, resolving subunits can be handled via the derivation of the members for the stub). They should also have constraints that there are no assignments before the actual body.

Resolution: The FTF agrees that this is an issue worth considering, but, due to lack of time, decided to defer its resolution to a future RTF working on this specification.
Revised Text: None
Disposition:	Deferred

Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 29, 2011: received issue
October 5, 2012: deferred
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
ssues with Action Language for Foundational UML (Alf) Beta 1 specification (ptc/2010-10-05)

Submitted by Ed Seidewitz (ed-s@modeldriven.com)


This is issue # 16475

ActivityDefinition and OperationDefinition Bodies

Subclauses: 15.2.2 ActivityDefinition and 15.2.16 OperationDefinition

OperationDefinition and ActivityDefinition should have derived attributes for their actual body that gets the subunit body if they are stubs (in all other cases, resolving subunits can be handled via the derivation of the members for the stub). They should also have constraints that there are no assignments before the actual body.