Issue 16492: Constraints (dd-rtf) Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The spec currently has no constraint sections. Should we add them? For example, we might require unowned diagram elements to be diagrams Resolution: This was received before the DD 1.1 RTF comment deadline of March 31, 2012, but was not addressed by the RTF due to lack of time. Disposition: Deferred Revised Text: Actions taken: January 31, 2011: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: "Bock, Conrad" To: "dd-ftf@omg.org" Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:37:20 -0500 Subject: DD constraints Thread-Topic: DD constraints Thread-Index: AcvBRsR7LSnkEyS6Tr61hHATSLa11Q== Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-NIST-MailScanner-From: conrad.bock@nist.gov DDers, The spec currently has no constraint sections. Should we add them? For example, we might require unowned diagram elements to be diagrams. Conrad Subject: Re: DD constraints To: "Bock, Conrad" Cc: "dd-ftf@omg.org" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 From: Maged Elaasar Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:19:10 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML03/25/M/IBM(Release 8.0.2FP5|April 13, 2010) at 01/31/2011 10:19:11 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER Yes, we should add to the model any constraints, and the doc-template can already pull them in. "Bock, Conrad" "Bock, Conrad" 01/31/2011 09:37 AM To "dd-ftf@omg.org" cc Subject DD constraints DDers, The spec currently has no constraint sections. Should we add them? For example, we might require unowned diagram elements to be diagrams. Conrad pic06801.gif