Issue 16518: Need for Groups of Asserted Links (sacm-rtf) Source: MITRE (Mr. Samuel Redwine, samredwine(at)verizon.net) Nature: Revision Severity: Critical Summary: Asserted links are already one-to-many, but only one is allowed at the supported-by (single) end. However, a strong case can be made for being able to have multiple ones and being able to group them. Substantial discussions both leading to the conclusion this should be included occurred during two FTF meetings ­ most recently in June 2011. Unfortunately, this occurred as the last discussion at the June meeting and exactly how best to do it (e.g. element names) evidentially due to time constraints was not judged firmly enough agreed upon to appear in the diagram resulting from this meeting. This still needs to be included/finalized. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: August 25, 2011: received issue Discussion: Deferred as keeping with current arrangement in ARM (1.. many). Disposition: Deferred End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 25 Aug 2011 13:27:52 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Samuel T. Redwine, Jr. Company: Sam Redwine Consulting mailFrom: samredwine@ieee.org Notification: Yes Specification: Argumentation Metamodel (ARM) Section: June Day 2 Diagram FormalNumber: ptc/2010-08-36 Version: FTF - Beta 1 RevisionDate: August 2010 Page: All Title: Need for Groups of Asserted Links Nature: Revision Severity: Critical test: 3qw8 B1: Report Issue Description: Asserted links are already one-to-many, but only one is allowed at the supported-by (single) end. However, a strong case can be made for being able to have multiple ones and being able to group them. Substantial discussions both leading to the conclusion this should be included occurred during two FTF meetings ­ most recently in June 2011. Unfortunately, this occurred as the last discussion at the June meeting and exactly how best to do it (e.g. element names) evidentially due to time constraints was not judged firmly enough agreed upon to appear in the diagram resulting from this meeting. This still needs to be included/finalized.