Issue 16523: "Aggregation Formulation" Needs to Be Adjusted (sbvr-rtf) Source: Business Rules Group (Mr. Ronald G. Ross, rross(at)BRSolutions.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Problem Statement: 1. "Aggregation" is currently used on page 47, but as far as I can tell is not defined anywhere. "Aggregation" should be included in SBVR under its real-world (MWUD). meaning. What is it meant to be (real-world sense). 2. For consistency, "Aggregation Formulation" should probably be renamed "Aggregating Formulae". See other issues submitted concerning "objectification" and "nominalization". Resolution: 1. "Aggregation" should be included in SBVR under its real-world (MWUD) meaning, and included in the appropriate section. 2. Change each instance of "aggregation formulation" in "aggregating formulae". Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: August 26, 2011: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== hoo-Newman-Id: 792635.52264.bm@omp1015.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1314399830; bh=MqwYgCv8NHO9eBP57/ecapoFq9pp3CTi8f+p5lNPT1c=; h=Message-ID:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=teqtvHUrQnOXIfz8QDKiQTwMsKG8TcoP1ehKsYUlj/S5LMRQ35OykjO8ds+RjcNUYBgr//vNe84QYU22RReYXwzZa/IlEM6lKezqhSMv2nwFWgmcOgJNqWtxbRbI8HkCowPGfdJAsZdyfQLZ6we5Q6S/EILPkX5TSGZyF6QnnRU= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: awtEQdIVM1nUFFKUIXrIJZ_zFv0aO5f0gSMhwk0ewdqsRIa uVtLzLaYILyo_hGzzb4f6bMCPiLCpcUEcBuoVmHlRKSwV751zolhp0WWYMGw sWB08w_j15GPttzI6CXhSHkVxWDzcHiyex_4BGfd0731eWwFoHXvUL0iaNB5 uMvnJqAma5rMymFUyVNGAlACx32VqsrSPWY7WqkQfH80RplwtZsoEAQtwAg4 gIMTSeMn_289tmSl4VQ2ab7QJd.n_YG3GZnRUYHMMSgrBk.DECkEZQYGsL9p XnpJnHRqRm_3tbsmI6v7LX1pXUw4_Z5VFHJqalO_ASYIRip1yOfaoE_6NBLT HWsV2CbxuQefYGUPOtLNYMPciMx3Zs69ZIsBGfVVlVwXUhBmMpD_kdA2RXfj Y7YkeM7z3KFn1PsQUGPGrtSXrEW2DPa1RITs- X-Yahoo-SMTP: MhfrpU2swBDLgYiYhNQDHBu0cE4o.vu2We1FRN9o X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:02:46 -0500 To: Juergen Boldt From: "Ronald G. Ross" Subject: SBVR issue - Please post (Thanks) Issue: "Aggregation Formulation" Needs to Be Adjusted Problem Statement: 1. "Aggregation" is currently used on page 47, but as far as I can tell is not defined anywhere. "Aggregation" should be included in SBVR under its real-world (MWUD). meaning. What is it meant to be (real-world sense). 2. For consistency, "Aggregation Formulation" should probably be renamed "Aggregating Formulae". See other issues submitted concerning "objectification" and "nominalization". Resolution: 1. "Aggregation" should be included in SBVR under its real-world (MWUD) meaning, and included in the appropriate section. 2. Change each instance of "aggregation formulation" in "aggregating formulae". From: "Donald Chapin" To: "'Juergen Boldt'" , , Subject: RE: issue 16523 -- SBVR RTF issue Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 12:55:29 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQE8psE/b8QV0o8WV3jmjUp1cY4fAJa8lEEQ X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Good-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0303.4EB3E0C4.005F, actions=tag X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=9/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.11.4.115414:17:9.975, ip=81.149.51.65, rules=__TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_MIXED, __HAS_X_MAILER, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, DOC_ATTACHED, __ANY_URI, LINK_TO_IMAGE, __FRAUD_CONTACT_NUM, __STOCK_PHRASE_24, ECARD_KNOWN_DOMAINS, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __C230066_P5, __HTML_MSWORD, __HTML_FONT_BLUE, __HAS_HTML, BODY_SIZE_10000_PLUS, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __IMGSPAM_BODY, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __STYLE_RATWARE_2, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, HTML_50_70, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, IMGSPAM_BODY X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr09.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B020C.4EB3E0C6.01C0,ss=1,vtr=str,vl=0,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false The .Closed, No Change Required. disposition for Issue 16523 is attached as per Meeting Notes of the October 21, 2001 SBVR RTF teleon. From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: 30 August 2011 16:19 To: issues@omg.org; sbvr-rtf@omg.org Subject: issue 16523 -- SBVR RTF issue X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 792635.52264.bm@omp1015.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1314399830; bh=MqwYgCv8NHO9eBP57/ecapoFq9pp3CTi8f+p5lNPT1c=; h=Message-ID:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=teqtvHUrQnOXIfz8QDKiQTwMsKG8TcoP1ehKsYUlj/S5LMRQ35OykjO8ds+RjcNUYBgr//vNe84QYU22RReYXwzZa/IlEM6lKezqhSMv2nwFWgmcOgJNqWtxbRbI8HkCowPGfdJAsZdyfQLZ6we5Q6S/EILPkX5TSGZyF6QnnRU= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: awtEQdIVM1nUFFKUIXrIJZ_zFv0aO5f0gSMhwk0ewdqsRIa uVtLzLaYILyo_hGzzb4f6bMCPiLCpcUEcBuoVmHlRKSwV751zolhp0WWYMGw sWB08w_j15GPttzI6CXhSHkVxWDzcHiyex_4BGfd0731eWwFoHXvUL0iaNB5 uMvnJqAma5rMymFUyVNGAlACx32VqsrSPWY7WqkQfH80RplwtZsoEAQtwAg4 gIMTSeMn_289tmSl4VQ2ab7QJd.n_YG3GZnRUYHMMSgrBk.DECkEZQYGsL9p XnpJnHRqRm_3tbsmI6v7LX1pXUw4_Z5VFHJqalO_ASYIRip1yOfaoE_6NBLT HWsV2CbxuQefYGUPOtLNYMPciMx3Zs69ZIsBGfVVlVwXUhBmMpD_kdA2RXfj Y7YkeM7z3KFn1PsQUGPGrtSXrEW2DPa1RITs- X-Yahoo-SMTP: MhfrpU2swBDLgYiYhNQDHBu0cE4o.vu2We1FRN9o X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:02:46 -0500 To: Juergen Boldt From: "Ronald G. Ross" Subject: SBVR issue - Please post (Thanks) Issue: "Aggregation Formulation" Needs to Be Adjusted Problem Statement: 1. "Aggregation" is currently used on page 47, but as far as I can tell is not defined anywhere. "Aggregation" should be included in SBVR under its real-world (MWUD). meaning. What is it meant to be (real-world sense). 2. For consistency, "Aggregation Formulation" should probably be renamed "Aggregating Formulae". See other issues submitted concerning "objectification" and "nominalization". Resolution: 1. "Aggregation" should be included in SBVR under its real-world (MWUD) meaning, and included in the appropriate section. 2. Change each instance of "aggregation formulation" in "aggregating formulae". Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 140 Kendrick Street, Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: 781 444 0320 www.omg.org