Issue 16604: Missing syntax for defining exception handlers (alf-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Significant
Summary: There should be an Alf statement that allows to define an exception handler for a block. The syntax should be within the minimum conformance subset (try - catch).
Resolution: The FTF agrees that this is an issue worth considering, but, due to lack of time, decided to defer its resolution to a future RTF working on this specification.
Revised Text: None
Disposition:	Deferred

Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
October 14, 2011: received issue
October 5, 2012: deferred
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 14 Oct 2011 07:39:20 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Mattias Mohlin
Employer:        IBM
mailFrom:        mattias.mohlin@se.ibm.com
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   ALF
Section:         N/A
FormalNumber:    ptc/2010-10-05
Version:         FTF ­ Beta 1
Doc_Year:        2010
Doc_Month:       October
Doc_Day:         05
Page:            N/A
Title:           Missing syntax for defining exception handlers
Nature:          Enhancement
Severity:        Significant
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:

There should be an Alf statement that allows to define an exception handler for a block. The syntax should be within the minimum conformance subset (try - catch).