Issue 16659: Date-Time issue: Specification Should Contain List of Date-Time (dtv-rtf) Source: International Business Machines (Mr. Mark H. Linehan, mlinehan(at)us.ibm.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The specification should contain a formal list of all the SBVR vocabularies defined by the specification. An example of such a list is given in SBVR clause 7. The list is needed by software that converts the specification text to XMI. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 16, 2011: received issue April 1, 2013: transferred from FTF Discussion: End of Annotations:===== MG Issue No: 16659 Title: Specification Should Contain List of Date-Time Vocabularies Source: IBM, Mark H. Linehan, mlinehan@us.ibm.com Summary: The specification should contain a formal list of all the SBVR vocabularies defined by the specification. An example of such a list is given in SBVR clause 7. The list is needed by software that converts the specification text to XMI. Resolution: Revised Text: Disposition: ??? From: "Donald Chapin" To: Subject: RE: issue 16659 Date-Time FTF issue Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:01:56 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHJVl2ZNVpOVDS4oCT1azndmG6eFpZCNQ8w X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0301.4F394206.00A8, actions=tag X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2012.2.13.163315:17:7.944, ip=81.149.51.65, rules=__TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_MIXED, __HAS_X_MAILER, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, DOC_ATTACHED, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __HTML_MSWORD, __HTML_FONT_BLUE, __HAS_HTML, BODY_SIZE_10000_PLUS, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __STYLE_RATWARE_2, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, HTML_70_90, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr10.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0203.4F394208.0149,ss=1,re=0.000,vtr=str,vl=0,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Attached is a draft resolution for DTV Issue 16659. There are a few open questions. Donald From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: 16 November 2011 21:37 To: issues@omg.org; date-time-ftf@omg.org Subject: issue 16659 Date-Time FTF issue To: juergen@omg.org Subject: Date-Time issue: Specification Should Contain List of Date-Time Vocabularies X-KeepSent: B36863D5:791437F4-85257949:006A4407; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1FP5 SHF29 November 12, 2010 From: Mark H Linehan Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:21:42 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01MC604/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.2FP1 ZX852FP1HF6|May 2, 2011) at 11/15/2011 14:21:47 x-cbid: 11111519-5930-0000-0000-000001A90542 -------------------------------- Mark H. Linehan STSM, Model Driven Business Transformation IBM Research To: date-time-ftf@omg.org Subject: RE: issue 16659 Date-Time FTF issue X-KeepSent: 3434AD7D:E56A1DED-852579A3:0074F6DC; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1FP5 SHF29 November 12, 2010 From: Mark H Linehan Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:23:35 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01MC604/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.3 ZX853HP5|January 12, 2012) at 02/13/2012 16:23:19, Serialize complete at 02/13/2012 16:23:19 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12021321-7182-0000-0000-000000C50A76 We need to coordinate this issue with issue 16921, which discusses possible restructure of the document. One place this could go would be a new subclause within Annex A, which currently just has a list of the machine readable files. Why should we have both a "Terminological Dictionary Registration Vocabulary" and a "Vocabulary Registration Vocabulary". And shouldn't one or the other be "Date-Time Terminological Dictionary/Vocabulary Registration Vocabulary"? These vocabularies are just examples and should not be registered: Example Vocabulary, EU-Rent's Common Vocabulary. The "General Concept:" and "Note:" captions are styled wrong (thanks, MS Word). If we chose to incorporate the SBVR vocabularies, should we do that here? -------------------------------- Mark H. Linehan STSM, Model Driven Business Transformation IBM Research From: "Donald Chapin" To: Date: 02/13/2012 12:08 PM Subject: RE: issue 16659 Date-Time FTF issue -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attached is a draft resolution for DTV Issue 16659. There are a few open questions. Donald From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: 16 November 2011 21:37 To: issues@omg.org; date-time-ftf@omg.org Subject: issue 16659 Date-Time FTF issue To: juergen@omg.org Subject: Date-Time issue: Specification Should Contain List of Date-Time Vocabularies X-KeepSent: B36863D5:791437F4-85257949:006A4407; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1FP5 SHF29 November 12, 2010 From: Mark H Linehan Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:21:42 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01MC604/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.2FP1 ZX852FP1HF6|May 2, 2011) at 11/15/2011 14:21:47 x-cbid: 11111519-5930-0000-0000-000001A90542 -------------------------------- Mark H. Linehan STSM, Model Driven Business Transformation IBM Research [attachment "Issue 16659 Specification Should Contain a List of Date-Time Vocabularies .doc" deleted by Mark H Linehan/Watson/IBM]