Issue 16671: Date Time Issue - time set2 is duration after time set1 (date-time-ftf) Source: International Business Machines (Mr. Mark H. Linehan, mlinehan(at)us.ibm.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The final submission document recorded the following issues about these verb concepts: Immediately under the glossary entry "time set2 is duration value after time set1": Issue: Should the second role be 'duration' instead of 'duration value'? Under the Definition for that entry: Issue: This is not quite right, because we do not have a verb concept that adds durations to time point sequences. And similarly, immediately under the glossary entry for "time set2 is duration value before time set1": Issue: Should the second role be 'duration' instead of 'duration value'? Under the Definition for that entry: Issue: This is not quite right, because we do not have a verb concept that subtracts durations from time point sequences Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 16, 2011: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== sposition: ??? OMG Issue No: 16671 Title: open issues about "time set2 is duration value after time set1" and "time set2 is duration value before time set1" Source: Mark H Linehan . IBM . mlinehan@us.ibm.com Summary: The final submission document recorded the following issues about these verb concepts: Immediately under the glossary entry "time set2 is duration value after time set1": Issue: Should the second role be 'duration' instead of 'duration value'? Under the Definition for that entry: Issue: This is not quite right, because we do not have a verb concept that adds durations to time point sequences. And similarly, immediately under the glossary entry for "time set2 is duration value before time set1": Issue: Should the second role be 'duration' instead of 'duration value'? Under the Definition for that entry: Issue: This is not quite right, because we do not have a verb concept that subtracts durations from time point sequences. Resolution: Revised Text: Disposition: ??? To: date-time-ftf@omg.org Subject: Date-Time Issue 16671 - Title: open issues about "time set2 is duration value after time set1" and "time set2 is duration value before time set1" X-KeepSent: 91462703:582D4186-85257A57:00678E84; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3 September 15, 2011 From: Mark H Linehan Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:53:44 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01MC604/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.3 ZX853HP5|January 12, 2012) at 08/11/2012 14:53:44 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12081118-3534-0000-0000-00000B5DCD69 Proposed resolution: -------------------------------- Mark H. Linehan STSM, IBM Research Date-Time Issue 16671 - time set2 is duration value after time set1.doc Disposition: Resolved OMG Issue No: 16671 Title: open issues about "time set2 is duration value after time set1" and "time set2 is duration value before time set1" Source: Mark H Linehan . IBM . mlinehan@us.ibm.com Summary: The final submission document recorded the following issues about these verb concepts: Immediately under the glossary entry "time set2 is duration value after time set1": Issue: Should the second role be 'duration' instead of 'duration value'? Under the Definition for that entry: Issue: This is not quite right, because we do not have a verb concept that adds durations to time point sequences. And similarly, immediately under the glossary entry for "time set2 is duration value before time set1": Issue: Should the second role be 'duration' instead of 'duration value'? Under the Definition for that entry: Issue: This is not quite right, because we do not have a verb concept that subtracts durations from time point sequences. Resolution: These two verb concepts are about adding or subtracting duration values from time sets. They are not used anywhere in the specification, are superfluous, and are deleted. Revised Text: These updates are based on the beta-2 specification document. In clause 10.6, replace figure 10.12 with this: In clause 10.6, delete these two glossary entries: time set2 is duration value after time set1 Synonymous Form: duration value after time set1 is time set2 Synonymous Form: duration value after time set1 Synonymous Form: time set2 equals duration value plus time set1 Synonymous Form: time set2 = time set1 + duration value Synonymous Form: time set2 = duration value + time set1 Synonymous Form: time set1 plus duration value Synonymous Form: duration value plus time set1 Synonymous Form: time set1 + duration value Synonymous Form: duration value + time set1 Definition: each time point sequence of time set2 is the duration that is quantified by duration value after a time point sequence of time set1 Necessity: The granularity of the time scale of each time point sequence of time set1 is the time unit of duration value. Example: {Gregorian day of year 59, Gregorian day of year 60} is 1 day after {Gregorian day of year 58, Gregorian day of year 59} Example: {Gregorian day of year 100 through Gregorian day of year 110} is 1 day after {Gregorian day of year 99 through Gregorian day of year 109} time set2 is duration value before time set1 Synonymous Form: duration value before time set1 is time set2 Synonymous Form: duration value before time set1 Synonymous Form: time set2 = time set1 - duration Synonymous Form: time set1 minus duration Synonymous Form: time set1 - duration Definition: each time point sequence of time set2 is duration value before a time point sequence of time set1 Necessity: The granularity of the time scale of each time point sequence of time set1 is the time unit of duration value. Example: {Gregorian day of year 59, Gregorian day of year 60} is 1 day before {Gregorian day of year 60, Gregorian day of year 61} Example: {Gregorian day of year 49 through Gregorian day of year 80} is 1 day before {Gregorian day of year 50 through Gregorian day of year 81} Disposition: Resolved