Issue 16718: Need to add a conforms to relationship for an element of type Interface to be able to associate a standard with it (updm-2-0-rtf) Source: MITRE (Dr. Fatma Dandashi, dandashi(at)mitre.org) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Need to add a conforms to relationship for an element of type Interface to be able to associate a standard with it Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 18, 2011: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: "Dandashi, Fatma" To: "issues@omg.org" Subject: new issue -- UPDM 2.0 RTF issue Thread-Topic: new issue -- UPDM 2.0 RTF issue Thread-Index: AcymBBGfXP5iiYfPQUKDHa2Q8W4nxA== Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:09:29 +0000 Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [129.83.31.52] Hi Juergen, Pls raise the following issue against the UPDM 2.0 spec. Need to add a conforms to relationship for an element of type Interface to be able to associate a standard with it. Thanks! From: "Dandashi, Fatma" To: Juergen Boldt , "issues@omg.org" , "updm-2-0-rtf@omg.org" Subject: RE: issue 16718 -- UPDM 2.0 RTF issue Thread-Topic: issue 16718 -- UPDM 2.0 RTF issue Thread-Index: AQHMpjW4Txv5eM+FNkCu/cPSosCuV5XdkB3g Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:13:42 +0000 Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [129.83.31.51] Reference to UPMS on page 15 is obsolete in the UPDM v2.0 spec: dtc/2011-05-07 .The UPDM team intended to reuse UPMS. However, since UPMS had not been formally adopted at the time of this specification, a separate service profile in UPDM was developed that used similar concepts, with the intent to replace it with UPMS in the future.. Replace with wording and use of SoaML..