Issue 16727: "thing has property". (sbvr-rtf) Source: Business Rule Solutions, LLC (Mr. Ron Ross, rross(at)brsolutions.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: (a) Clause 11 should include the verb concept "thing has property". This verb concept should appear in figure 11.5. (b) Property needs to be indicated as an abstract concept in Clause 13 (since it is in the universe of discourse, not the model). Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 29, 2011: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== hoo-Newman-Id: 915687.64397.bm@omp1008.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1322528719; bh=bjxzBBeNLTnXoaYbHxFcE98kv+SBd65c2YCM4gkodgE=; h=Message-ID:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=zlBBR1nRvjY54rbqIlHrDp1uB3IiaYWoIX4/iN807b3vZWP9cVU5gwKbg5J9KjrcApweD9B/IYH1lG7dhzJ3WskXEHJ/17I0NGanexEp6qDDwst8kxN1le+rwGUu0v7m/ij8CTeOYBntQLoKa6HBh50BJ4dlKuX8IroKkf20FQs= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: mJDn3YgVM1mTds1K_pzwC4r5W1VDrPbhYvioAWrqxrnGmvQ GCQvmAq7HspuQZ8iIwepShu_MCzo4OqXcsBIZRmnl5nKKRp1l9l1UHhAGsD. DT37rdeMBGoul9gsnX.NV3uroCbTKzFAP2jY02cyVa8XageZsuBgscGVT9_4 ZJNLohBFHhc1Ce1LPeWOiygweH5NUwO57Dd4MNWupxbdy0k3YzThHSvw2fQJ 0SUH.sqhy8uDk2LGYkB7gMFVvbGLrN_po4t.MMKdfhoGDZhWETuc79Gnaj0b 0twcRaxcAcVypYku400vaaObHRSIDYg5.Vb9NUesNkq8E3aJ.eO2UW_jvJsn NbcobvqtGEpsXCUmyw8DFFxRToqq034QVJbWG3ISIolMtV2wPPpwo8hyuh0B b9OTI0rFFmCuWa8dXPF.pvg_wL7BIx40LUWYDdxOcnpcLXMk.mxqWjNv1gIr ABGK2OIUCWvNWPfssr.53dlYOV61Eij7muET.vyrzGmFDlYn8VoZSnMvZjAj T8fMUyiBHcM_8MnsQwrYBYEx1RJZ4kk8qSCTE6J6I2LuLHXyV1q3omhuqcwx b0eeic1xQSMXoFX6WBKg2_z5H7rUSD8gerpS6IwCjRRsYXCSloHgKfhY- X-Yahoo-SMTP: MhfrpU2swBDLgYiYhNQDHBu0cE4o.vu2We1FRN9o X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:05:42 -0600 To: "Donald Chapin" , "'keri'" , "'Don Baisley'" From: "Ronald G. Ross" Subject: [new issue] RE: issue 15623 & 14843-- SBVR RTF issue - Draft Resolution (updated Figures and typos) Cc: Juergen Boldt Juergen, Please post the following new SBVR issue: "thing has property". (a) Clause 11 should include the verb concept "thing has property". This verb concept should appear in figure 11.5. (b) Propertyneeds to be indicated as an abstract concept in Clause 13 (since it is in the universe of discourse, not the model). Thanks, Ron At 01:58 AM 11/14/2011, Donald Chapin wrote: Yes, for both points. Donald From: Ronald G. Ross [ mailto:rross@BRSolutions.com] Sent: 13 November 2011 21:05 To: Donald Chapin; 'keri'; 'Don Baisley' Subject: RE: issue 15623 & 14843-- SBVR RTF issue - Draft Resolution (updated Figures and typos) Do I need to post an issue for it?? At 02:25 AM 11/13/2011, Donald Chapin wrote: Keri, I think the thing has property line needs to be left off the diagram for now. It can be added in v1.2. We also need to mark propertyas an abstract concept in Clause 13 as it is in the universe of discourse and not the model. Donald From: keri [ mailto:keri_ah@mac.com] Sent: 13 November 2011 04:07 To: Don Baisley Cc: Donald Chapin; Ronald G. Ross Subject: Re: issue 15623 & 14843-- SBVR RTF issue - Draft Resolution (updated Figures and typos) It would need to be added. Is there a 'painless' way to add it? On Nov 12, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Don Baisley wrote: I have one question about the updated figure 11.5. It shows a "thing has property" verb concept. I don't find that verb concept in clause 11. Is it added by one of the recent resolutions? I don't oppose it. I just want to be sure the diagram matches the text. Don -----Original Message----- From: keri [mailto:keri_ah@mac.com] Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 11:37 AM To: Donald Chapin; Don Baisley; Ronald G. Ross; Mark Linehan; Ed Barkmeyer; John Hall; John Healy Subject: Re: issue 15623 & 14843-- SBVR RTF issue - Draft Resolution (updated Figures and typos) Importance: High Donald, Don, All, Attached is an updated 15623 Resolution with the Clause 11 and 12 Figures added in, picking up from the version supplied by Don after Friday's telcon. (provided both in change-tracked form and in a changes-accepted version) Note: I also added an updated Figure from Annex B. This document reflects the two corrections to the Annex G & H wording changes that Ron pointed out yesterday. Note that the updated Figure 11.5 also includes a change that corrects the omitted 'property' box from that diagram, as discussed as part of the 'typo' corrections for that earlier, completed issue from Ron. Please let me know if anything you spot that is wrong, in the next 24 hrs. Otherwise, Donald, this represents my completed bits for this issue. Regards, Keri Blog || http://www.RonRoss.info/blog/ LinkedIn || http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ronald-ross/1/3b/346 Twitter || https://twitter.com/Ronald_G_Ross Homepage || http://www.RonRoss.info Blog || http://www.RonRoss.info/blog/ LinkedIn || http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ronald-ross/1/3b/346 Twitter || https://twitter.com/Ronald_G_Ross Homepage || http://www.RonRoss.info