Issue 16850: fundamental difference in modelling style of each metamodel (sacm-rtf)
Source: Adelard LLP (Mr. Luke Emmet, loe(at)adelard.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: There is a fundamental difference in how modelling style of each metamodel. For example SAEM has a more "fact oriented" (nouns and verbs) approach which has a simpler MOF implementation. ARM has 

classes instead.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
November 30, 2011: received issue
Discussion: 
While the modeling style of the Evidence Metamodel was considered beneficial because of the stronger
alignment with SBVR and more formal approach to representing claims and using structured natural
language with the formal semantics, the discussion to how to accommodate this style in the Argumentation
metamodel is deferred to the RTF.
Disposition: Deferred
End of Annotations:=====
ssues From: Luke Emmet <loe@adelard.com>

This is issue # 16850

fundamental difference in modelling style of each metamodel

There is a fundamental difference in how modelling style of each metamodel. For example SAEM has a more "fact oriented" (nouns and verbs) approach which has a simpler MOF implementation. ARM has 

classes instead.