Issue 17092: Inconsistency between diagram and description (kdm-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: In Section 12.14.1, there is an inconsistency concerning the DefinedType class. The cardinality of the "codeElement" containment reference in Figure 12.12 is 0..1 (zero or one) while it is described as 0..* (zero to many) in the description of the class that follows the diagram (Anonymous datatypes used in the definition of the datatype). To be consistent with the class description, the relationship in the diagram should be corrected to read 0..*. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: January 31, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Aboubacar Kaba Employer: Benchmark Canada mailFrom: akaba@benchmarkconsulting.com Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: KDM Section: 12.14.1 FormalNumber: formal/2011-08-04 Version: 1.3 Doc_Year: 2011 Doc_Month: August Doc_Day: 04 Page: 102 Title: Inconsistency between diagram and description Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Description: In Section 12.14.1, there is an inconsistency concerning the DefinedType class. The cardinality of the "codeElement" containment reference in Figure 12.12 is 0..1 (zero or one) while it is described as 0..* (zero to many) in the description of the class that follows the diagram (Anonymous datatypes used in the definition of the datatype). To be consistent with the class description, the relationship in the diagram should be corrected to read 0..*.