Issue 17228: Verdict should be renamed to VerdictKind (uml-testing-profile-rtf) Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS (Mr. Marc-Florian Wendland, marc-florian.wendland(at)fokus.fraunhofer.de) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: The enumeration Verdict should be renamed to VerdictKind, to be consistent with UML and all other UML profiles. Resolution: Deferred due to time restrictions. Disposition: Deferred Revised Text: Actions taken: March 13, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Marc-Florian Wendland Employer: Fraunhofer FOKUS mailFrom: marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de Terms_Agreement: I agree Specification: UML Testing Profile Section: 7.2.2.11 FormalNumber: ptc/2011-07-19 Version: 1.1 Doc_Year: 2011 Doc_Month: July Doc_Day: 19 Page: 26 Title: Verdict should be renamed to VerdictKind Nature: Revision Severity: Minor CODE: 3TMw8 B1: Report Issue Description: The enumeration Verdict should be renamed to VerdictKind, to be consistent with UML and all other UML profiles. Subject: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 18:37:55 +0200 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 Thread-Index: Ac0pSxcm73eiz74HQN6Zl6DLcTFYSQ== From: "Wendland, Marc-Florian" To: X-cloud-security-sender: marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de X-cloud-security-recipient: uml-testing-profile-rtf@omg.org X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mx-gate04-haj2 with 8D195794001 X-cloud-security: scantime:.5800 Dear members, since the resolution for issue 17228 would actually just be a simple renaming of the enumeration Verdict to VerdictKind, I'd like to incorporate this resolution as well into the first ballot of UTP 1.2. The target of the issue is to align the name of enumeration Verdict with other UML profiles and the UML itself. In all other UML(-related) specifications, the name of an enumeration follows a particular naming schema, i.e. 'XyzKind', e.g. MessageKind, ParameterDirectionKind, DirectionKind etc. UTP is somehow exceptional to that, since it uses Verdict as name for an enumeration. Actually, the enumeration is not a verdict, but a finite list of verdict kinds. In order to align UTP to the standard UML-way of enumeration naming, I would like to change Verdict to VerdictKind. Do you agree, and, if not, please leave a comment why you did not agree. Issue 17228 description: http://www.omg.org/issues/uml-testing-profile-rtf.open.html#Issue17228 Best Regards, Marc-Florian ################################################ Marc-Florian Wendland Master of Science (M.Sc.) ------------------------------------------------ Fraunhofer Institut FOKUS Modeling und Testing Department Kaiserin-Augusta-Alle 31 D-10589 Berlin ------------------------------------------------ Tel: +49 (30) - 3463 7395 Email: marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de ################################################ Subject: Re: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 From: "Prof. Zhen Ru Dai" Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 20:01:18 +0200 Cc: To: "Wendland, Marc-Florian" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.haw-hamburg.de ok with me Lulu Am 03.05.2012 um 18:37 schrieb Wendland, Marc-Florian: Dear members, since the resolution for issue 17228 would actually just be a simple renaming of the enumeration Verdict to VerdictKind, I'd like to incorporate this resolution as well into the first ballot of UTP 1.2. The target of the issue is to align the name of enumeration Verdict with other UML profiles and the UML itself. In all other UML(-related) specifications, the name of an enumeration follows a particular naming schema, i.e. 'XyzKind', e.g. MessageKind, ParameterDirectionKind, DirectionKind etc. UTP is somehow exceptional to that, since it uses Verdict as name for an enumeration. Actually, the enumeration is not a verdict, but a finite list of verdict kinds. In order to align UTP to the standard UML-way of enumeration naming, I would like to change Verdict to VerdictKind. Do you agree, and, if not, please leave a comment why you did not agree. Issue 17228 description: http://www.omg.org/issues/uml-testing-profile-rtf.open.html#Issue17228 Best Regards, Marc-Florian ################################################ Marc-Florian Wendland Master of Science (M.Sc.) ------------------------------------------------ Fraunhofer Institut FOKUS Modeling und Testing Department Kaiserin-Augusta-Alle 31 D-10589 Berlin ------------------------------------------------ Tel: +49 (30) - 3463 7395 Email: marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de ################################################ -- Prof. Zhen Ru Dai University of Applied Science Hamburg Berliner Tor 7 Room 7.86 20099 Hamburg Tel. +49-40-42875-8153 X-Footer: c2VzbS5pdA== Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 22:10:25 +0200 From: Gabriella Carrozza Reply-To: gcarrozza@sesm.it Organization: SESM scarl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 To: "Hagar, Jon D" CC: "Wendland, Marc-Florian" , "uml-testing-profile-rtf@omg.org" Subject: Re: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 agree Il 04/05/12 14:14, Hagar, Jon D ha scritto: I agree Jon D. Hagar Cell - 303-903-5536 Lockheed Martin From: Wendland, Marc-Florian [mailto:marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 12:38 PM To: uml-testing-profile-rtf@omg.org Subject: EXTERNAL: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 Dear members, since the resolution for issue 17228 would actually just be a simple renaming of the enumeration Verdict to VerdictKind, I'd like to incorporate this resolution as well into the first ballot of UTP 1.2. The target of the issue is to align the name of enumeration Verdict with other UML profiles and the UML itself. In all other UML(-related) specifications, the name of an enumeration follows a particular naming schema, i.e. 'XyzKind', e.g. MessageKind, ParameterDirectionKind, DirectionKind etc. UTP is somehow exceptional to that, since it uses Verdict as name for an enumeration. Actually, the enumeration is not a verdict, but a finite list of verdict kinds. In order to align UTP to the standard UML-way of enumeration naming, I would like to change Verdict to VerdictKind. Do you agree, and, if not, please leave a comment why you did not agree. Issue 17228 description: http://www.omg.org/issues/uml-testing-profile-rtf.open.html#Issue17228 Best Regards, Marc-Florian ################################################ Marc-Florian Wendland Master of Science (M.Sc.) ------------------------------------------------ Fraunhofer Institut FOKUS Modeling und Testing Department Kaiserin-Augusta-Alle 31 D-10589 Berlin ------------------------------------------------ Tel: +49 (30) - 3463 7395 Email: marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de ################################################ -- ____________________________________________________ Gabriella Carrozza, Ph.D mobile: +39 3343404139 skype: bluegabry e-mail: gcarrozza@sesm.it http://www.gabriellacarrozza.it _________ R&D Project Manager at SESM scarl Stabilimento SELEX Sistemi Integrati di Giugliano via Circumvallazione esterna di Napoli 80014 Giugliano in Campania (NA) tel:+390818180650 fax:+390818180404 http://www.sesm.it --------- Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per l'Informatica Complesso Univ.Monte Sant'Angelo Via Cinthia, Ed.1. 80125 Napoli, ITALY http://www.consorzio-cini.it ______________________________________________________ This email and any file attached to it (when applicable) contain(s) confidential information that is exclusively addressed to its recipient(s). If you are not the indicated recipient, you are informed that reading, using, disseminating and/or copying it without authorisation is forbidden in accordance with the legislation in effect. If you have received this email by mistake, please immediately notify the sender of the situation by resending it to their email address. Avoid printing this message if it is not absolutely necessary. From: Markus Schacher To: "Wendland, Marc-Florian" , "uml-testing-profile-rtf@omg.org" Subject: RE: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 Thread-Topic: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 Thread-Index: Ac0pSxcm73eiz74HQN6Zl6DLcTFYSQCfFQ/A Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 20:35:02 +0000 Accept-Language: de-CH, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [188.60.249.28] Hi all, I agree as well, Best regards and see you soon, Markus From: Wendland, Marc-Florian [mailto:marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de] Sent: Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2012 18:38 To: uml-testing-profile-rtf@omg.org Subject: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 Dear members, since the resolution for issue 17228 would actually just be a simple renaming of the enumeration Verdict to VerdictKind, I'd like to incorporate this resolution as well into the first ballot of UTP 1.2. The target of the issue is to align the name of enumeration Verdict with other UML profiles and the UML itself. In all other UML(-related) specifications, the name of an enumeration follows a particular naming schema, i.e. 'XyzKind', e.g. MessageKind, ParameterDirectionKind, DirectionKind etc. UTP is somehow exceptional to that, since it uses Verdict as name for an enumeration. Actually, the enumeration is not a verdict, but a finite list of verdict kinds. In order to align UTP to the standard UML-way of enumeration naming, I would like to change Verdict to VerdictKind. Do you agree, and, if not, please leave a comment why you did not agree. Issue 17228 description: http://www.omg.org/issues/uml-testing-profile-rtf.open.html#Issue17228 Best Regards, Marc-Florian ################################################ Marc-Florian Wendland Master of Science (M.Sc.) ------------------------------------------------ Fraunhofer Institut FOKUS Modeling und Testing Department Kaiserin-Augusta-Alle 31 D-10589 Berlin ------------------------------------------------ Tel: +49 (30) - 3463 7395 Email: marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de ################################################ Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 14:03:04 +0200 From: Cyril Ballagny Organization: ModelioSoft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 To: "Wendland, Marc-Florian" CC: "uml-testing-profile-rtf@omg.org" Subject: Re: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=softeam.fr; s=MAILOUT; t=1336392194; bh=fPdQTlrPTeXIYXVf1H78CxHXTfPWcVLXBrpXADSNW9w=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=W4HjZ/SzmP9m+lLQp0EKE3lubhKiXV/vD1L0sCnG9j/nqDMqHWIsdcoyIZANMtd3I lJ9TqYUQ/yMMz8B3I2hdtEGnlvZ4kEkp5ch6r9ARknaiIzP4fpjk1QJlEv0PTD3M+m C+eHEoqbi5szHqY3I3FgpKfjYyRm5JpjVaG4HN0M= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.2.2 idefix3.softeam.com A610A63A54DD X-Softeam-fr-MailScanner-ID: A610A63A54DD.AD533 X-Softeam-fr-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Softeam-fr-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel (inscrit sur la liste blanche), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.398, requis 3.5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00) X-Softeam-fr-MailScanner-From: cyril.ballagny@softeam.fr X-Spam-Status: No Hi All, I agree too. Best regards, Cyril. On 06/05/2012 22:35, Markus Schacher wrote: Hi all, I agree as well, Best regards and see you soon, Markus From: Wendland, Marc-Florian [mailto:marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de] Sent: Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2012 18:38 To: uml-testing-profile-rtf@omg.org Subject: Request for Comment on Issue 17228 Dear members, since the resolution for issue 17228 would actually just be a simple renaming of the enumeration Verdict to VerdictKind, I'd like to incorporate this resolution as well into the first ballot of UTP 1.2. The target of the issue is to align the name of enumeration Verdict with other UML profiles and the UML itself. In all other UML(-related) specifications, the name of an enumeration follows a particular naming schema, i.e. 'XyzKind', e.g. MessageKind, ParameterDirectionKind, DirectionKind etc. UTP is somehow exceptional to that, since it uses Verdict as name for an enumeration. Actually, the enumeration is not a verdict, but a finite list of verdict kinds. In order to align UTP to the standard UML-way of enumeration naming, I would like to change Verdict to VerdictKind. Do you agree, and, if not, please leave a comment why you did not agree. Issue 17228 description: http://www.omg.org/issues/uml-testing-profile-rtf.open.html#Issue17228 Best Regards, Marc-Florian ################################################ Marc-Florian Wendland Master of Science (M.Sc.) ------------------------------------------------ Fraunhofer Institut FOKUS Modeling und Testing Department Kaiserin-Augusta-Alle 31 D-10589 Berlin ------------------------------------------------ Tel: +49 (30) - 3463 7395 Email: marc-florian.wendland@fokus.fraunhofer.de ################################################ -- ************************************** Dr. Cyril Ballagny R&D Department Softeam, Modeliosoft, France http://www.softeam.com/ http://www.modeliosoft.com/ http://www.modelio.org/ Tel. +33 130121675 (office) **************************************