Issue 1738:  Object._request variants are unspecified (java-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: It is possible that some part of the C++ mapping is intended to apply
 here, but even so, the Java mapping should stand independantly of the
 C++ mapping. Requiring Java developers (of ORBs and of applications) to
 know C++ and the C++ mapping seems excessive
 
 
 

Resolution: closed issue
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 27, 1998: received issue
June 4, 1999: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Return-Path: <raz@arrakis.com.au>
Sender: raz@arrakis.com.au
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 09:42:37 -0300
From: Roland Turner <raz@arrakis.com.au>
Organization: -
To: java-rtf@omg.org
Subject: IDL-Java issues

I'm a little embarrassed to be posting these so late. I've been
meaning
to clean these up and check their status first for some time, but the
opportunity doesn't appear to have presented itself. Now it's probably
too late to make use of them this time around, but here they are for
future consideration.

However, the first item should be considered this time around if at
all
possible.

Thanks.



Object._request variants are unspecified

It is possible that some part of the C++ mapping is intended to apply
here, but even so, the Java mapping should stand independantly of the
C++ mapping. Requiring Java developers (of ORBs and of applications)
to
know C++ and the C++ mapping seems excessive