Issue 17383: Comments on Section (hdata-ftf)
Source: THALES (Mr. Hugues Vincent, hugues.vincent(at)thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary:  How is this wpecification supposed to evolve wrt the version of OMG's RLUS and HL7's RLUS? I believe this should be a bit explained in section 1.
- Complex operations as well as Security need to be also introduced in this section.
- Last paragraph: add reference [12] when speaking of the OMG RLUS PIM.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
May 21, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 21 May 2012 11:13:34 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Hugues VINCENT
Employer:        Thales
mailFrom:        hugues.vincent@thalesgroup.com
Terms_Agreement: 
Specification:   hDATA REST Transport for RLUS RFC
Section:         1
FormalNumber:    health/2011-09-04
Version:         -
Doc_Year:        Year
Doc_Month:       Month
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            -
Title:           Comments on Section 1
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


- How is this wpecification supposed to evolve wrt the version of OMG's RLUS and HL7's RLUS? I believe this should be a bit explained in section 1.
- Complex operations as well as Security need to be also introduced in this section.
- Last paragraph: add reference [12] when speaking of the OMG RLUS PIM.