Issue 17387: Comments on Section 8 (hdata-ftf)
Source: THALES (Mr. Hugues Vincent, hugues.vincent(at)thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Significant
Summary: Section 8.1 - 2nd paragraph: sentence not parsable: "If the custom security mechanism The URIs..."
- Bullet 2: should be "URI or none" on account of the HTTP Transport Security
- Bullet 5: "State Diagram": what is the format of this UML state diagram? XMI?
- Section 8.3 - last sentence: which "template" are you speaking of? 
- Section 8.4 and 8.5: these sections should be noted as informative or non-normative (in their title)
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
May 21, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 21 May 2012 11:17:35 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Hugues VINCENT
Employer:        Thales
mailFrom:        hugues.vincent@thalesgroup.com
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   hDATA REST Transport for RLUS RFC
Section:         8
FormalNumber:    health/2011-09-04
Version:         -
Doc_Year:        Year
Doc_Month:       Month
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            -
Title:           Comments on Section 8
Nature:          Clarification
Severity:        Significant
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


- Section 8.1 - 2nd paragraph: sentence not parsable: "If the custom security mechanism The URIs..."
- Bullet 2: should be "URI or none" on account of the HTTP Transport Security
- Bullet 5: "State Diagram": what is the format of this UML state diagram? XMI?
- Section 8.3 - last sentence: which "template" are you speaking of? 
- Section 8.4 and 8.5: these sections should be noted as informative or non-normative (in their title)