Issue 17426: UML vs. text inconsistencies in clause 12 (date-time-ftf) Source: NIST (Mr. Edward J. Barkmeyer, edbark(at)nist.gov) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: In clause 12.1.2, Figure 12.3 shows an association 'atomic time coordinate has index', but no such verb concept is declared in the text. (The verb concept, however, is used in numerous definitions.) In clause 12.3.1, the UML diagram refers to a 'G. month of year coordinate', which is not documented in the text, and it says the 'G. day of year coordinate' is compound, but it is defined in the text to be atomic. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: June 14, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== te: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:05:02 -0400 From: Ed Barkmeyer Reply-To: Organization: NIST User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) To: "issues@omg.org" Subject: DTV Issue: UML vs. text inconsistencies in clause 12 X-NISTMEL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@mel.nist.gov for more information X-NISTMEL-MailScanner-ID: q5EM58DW018327 X-NISTMEL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-NISTMEL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-NISTMEL-MailScanner-From: edbark@nist.gov X-NISTMEL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1340316311.05769@tIdq6lATVkyGzA6bRVZgBA X-Spam-Status: No Specification: Date Time Vocabulary Version: Beta-1 Title: UML vs. text inconsistencies in clause 12 Source: Ed Barkmeyer, NIST, edbark@nist.gov In clause 12.1.2, Figure 12.3 shows an association 'atomic time coordinate has index', but no such verb concept is declared in the text. (The verb concept, however, is used in numerous definitions.) In clause 12.3.1, the UML diagram refers to a 'G. month of year coordinate', which is not documented in the text, and it says the 'G. day of year coordinate' is compound, but it is defined in the text to be atomic. To: date-time-ftf@omg.org Subject: Date-Time Issue 17426 - UML vs. text inconsistencies in clause 12 X-KeepSent: 322DCDDA:39D99B35-85257A67:00003A81; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3 September 15, 2011 From: Mark H Linehan Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:03:32 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01MC604/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.3FP2IF1|July 25, 2012) at 08/26/2012 20:03:33 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12082700-5112-0000-0000-00000B7EBA55 Proposed resolution: -------------------------------- Mark H. Linehan STSM, IBM Research Date-Time Issue 17426 - UML vs. text inconsistencies in clause 12.doc Disposition: Resolved OMG Issue No: 17426 Title: UML vs. text inconsistencies in clause 12 Source: Ed Barkmeyer, NIST, edbark@nist.gov Summary: In clause 12.1.2, Figure 12.3 shows an association 'atomic time coordinate has index', but no such verb concept is declared in the text. (The verb concept, however, is used in numerous definitions.) In clause 12.3.1, the UML diagram refers to a 'G. month of year coordinate', which is not documented in the text, and it says the 'G. day of year coordinate' is compound, but it is defined in the text to be atomic. Resolution: The missing .atomic time coordinate has index. is added and the diagram is corrected to match the text. Revised Text: (All references are to the beta-2 specification.) In clause 10.5.3, add this glossary entry immediately after .atomic time coordinate indicates time point.: atomic time coordinate has index Definition: the index is the index of the time point that is indicated by the atomic time coordinate Example: The index of .March. is 3. In clause 11.6, replace figure 11.7, which makes the following corrections: . Shows .Gregorian day of year coordinate. as a relative atomic time coordinate, rather than a relative compound time coordinate. . Replaces .Gregorian month of year coordinate. with .Gregorian day of month coordinate. as a relative time coordinate. <> Disposition: Resolved