Issue 17481: Examples (instance diagrams) in SMM spec contain AdditiveMeasure and AggregatedMeasure (smm-rtf) Source: Cordys (Mr. Henk de Man, hdman(at)cordys.com) Nature: Revision Severity: Summary: Examples (instance diagrams) in SMM spec contain AdditiveMeasure and AggregatedMeasure. I think that the meta-model suggests that these don't exist (anymore ?), as there's only CollectiveMeasure Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: July 13, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== s is issue # 17481 From: Henk de Man Examples (instance diagrams) in SMM spec contain AdditiveMeasure and AggregatedMeasure Examples (instance diagrams) in SMM spec contain AdditiveMeasure and AggregatedMeasure. I think that the meta-model suggests that these don't exist (anymore ?), as there's only CollectiveMeasure From: Larry Hines To: Juergen Boldt , "issues@omg.org" , "smm-rtf@omg.org" Subject: RE: issues 17479 - 17481 -- SMM RTF issues Thread-Topic: issues 17479 - 17481 -- SMM RTF issues Thread-Index: AQHNYRxSvKcB9e29fEaiwIF/XYU/55cqYPSg Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 14:31:18 +0000 Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.24.11.7] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2012 14:31:19.0115 (UTC) FILETIME=[7FBA61B0:01CD6296] With respect to #17479: Yes, it should be rescale from. In fact, in my previous note I said that the rescaling formula in McCabe Cyclomatic Complexity should be 1+baseMeasure when it should of course be 1+rescaleFrom. With respect to #17480: Actually, I think the association should be baseMeasurementTo:BaseMeasurementRelationship[0..*] Specifies the relationship instance that defines the accumulation for this measurement. With respect to #17481: Yes, both should be CollectiveMeasure. From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:24 PM To: issues@omg.org; smm-rtf@omg.org Subject: issues 17479 - 17481 -- SMM RTF issues This is issue # 17479 From: Henk de Man Wrong reference In examples/instances of rescaled measures in SMM spec, there is sometimes reference (from formula string) to "baseMeasure". But that is wrong, as according to the meta-model, a rescaled measure does not have .base measure., but .rescale from. ? ========================================================= This is issue # 17480 From: Henk de Man CollectiveMeasurement class In CollectiveMeasurement class: Text says: Associations: baseMeasurement:DimensionalMeasurement[0..*]: Identifies the measurements from which this collective measurement was derived. However: the meta-model suggests that there's baseMeasurementTo. Not baseMeasurement. So, the associations text is wrong. ========================================================= This is issue # 17481 From: Henk de Man Examples (instance diagrams) in SMM spec contain AdditiveMeasure and AggregatedMeasure Examples (instance diagrams) in SMM spec contain AdditiveMeasure and AggregatedMeasure. I think that the meta-model suggests that these don't exist (anymore ?), as there's only CollectiveMeasure This message has been scanned by MailController. Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services 140 Kendrick Street, Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA Tel: 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: 781 444 0320 www.omg.org