Issue 17492: Section B5.2 (canonical-xmi-ftf)
Source: Oracle (Mr. Dave Hawkins, dave.hawkins(at)oracle.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: This imposes an alphabetic order on the superclasses that isn't
mentioned in the main specification for the superClassFirst option.
It isn't clear to me what this is ordered on. It can't just be
the name of the superclass, because there could be multiple
superclasses with the same name. It's also a very complicated
way to order the properties that will almost certainly be
inconsistent with the way the metamodel is defined. Why not
just sort the properties alphabetically by name?


Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 13, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 17492	From: Dave Hawkins <dave.hawkins@oracle.com>

Section B5.2

This imposes an alphabetic order on the superclasses that isn't
mentioned in the main specification for the superClassFirst option.
It isn't clear to me what this is ordered on. It can't just be
the name of the superclass, because there could be multiple
superclasses with the same name. It's also a very complicated
way to order the properties that will almost certainly be
inconsistent with the way the metamodel is defined. Why not
just sort the properties alphabetically by name?