Issue 17503: functor should have an enumeration defined in the spec (smm-rtf)
Source: Cordys (Mr. Henk de Man, hdman(at)cordys.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 

In SMM, a binary measure has a functor. 

Examples in the spec (instance  models) suggest functor values like “sum”, “difference”, “times”, “divide”. 

This sounds like functor should have an enumeration defined in the spec, like also accumulator has for a collective measure.




However, SMM does not do that for functor. Why not? It is rather similar (see also that accumulator has a value “sum” ..).





Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 17, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

ogle-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :x-gm-message-state;
        bh=g9UmAaNWgBqKVL/oJ3xsEmerJVa9fOOhs4nj/1U9ZcE=;
        b=jB5W92zlPYJxh8yctcmqVd0gCNLGEruejg5ldrNCcPbDpngVMnreL5C8GkBFumGeKv
         fXhn0zOwot+bjCuHijah6cE5V57C7DnFYQzXPRncIXxFb6qBWoq6AvCVD4jPACBFU+KS
         2IpO97qNviRi6OejACpR7UWP5wUml1JMWsD8qDGi4vY5+0f9r8BeN7AUPCMe8ZcsrO8/
         j7Mqh6ckxDruCQssFKYxs0MbSpR22JO7meXGGjcMk9HezdodeG7lQx/QgRiVf9fy9yR2
         Jj6cKLTz56WzxUyNjtuSRbQMt6/QHzUVmpFJmJv3S+1hpWOPhQXIWBOolB+phRFu3jle
         RVWA==
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:35:16 +0200
Subject: A next SMM RTF issue
From: Henk de Man <hdman@cordys.com>
To: Juergen Boldt <juergen@omg.org>
Cc: Henk de Man <hdman@cordys.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDGjFl0ywTgGfrnpcMd4HXxLhFscy1OaGvKUiNJ/rUnsZ02IjVPAl6FQadufmPrSdV+GBk


Juergen, 


This is also an issue for SMM RTF:


In SMM, a binary measure has a functor. 

Examples in the spec (instance  models) suggest functor values like .sum., .difference., .times., .divide.. 

This sounds like functor should have an enumeration defined in the spec, like also accumulator has for a collective measure.




However, SMM does not do that for functor. Why not? It is rather similar (see also that accumulator has a value .sum. ..).




Regards,




Henk de Man

Cordys 

\