Issue 17541: Inconsistent Use of ‘Concept Type’ (date-time-ftf)
Source: International Business Machines (Mr. Mark H. Linehan, mlinehan(at)us.ibm.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Each kind of time point is a ‘concept type’.  That is, the instances of each kind of time point are themselves concepts.

The specification is inconsistent about this.  Referring to the beta 2 document:

Figure 10.2 shows the following as <<concept type>> but the text does not:
calendar day
calendar week
calendar month
calendar year
Figure 11.1 and the associated text do not mark these concepts as ‘concept type’, but should:
Gregorian day
Gregorian week
Gregorian month
Gregorian year
Figure 11.3 and the associated text do not mark these concepts as ‘concept type’, but should:
common year
leap year
centennial year
quadricentennial year
Gregorian day of year
Gregorian day of month
Gregorian month of year
Figure 11.7 shows the following concepts that should be marked <<concept type>>
Gregorian year
Gregorian day
Figure 12.1 and the associated text do not mark these concepts as ‘concept type’, but should:
calendar week
week of year
day of week
weekday of year
Figure 13.1 and the associated text do not mark these concepts as ‘concept type’, but should:
hour of day
minute of day
second of day
leap second
minute of hour
second of minute
Figure 13.3 shows the following concepts that should be marked <<concept type>>
hour of day
minute of day
Figure 14.1 shows the following class ‘internet time point’ that should be marked <<concept type>>, but that is missing from the text

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
August 6, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
sposition:    ???   
	OMG Issue No:  17541 
Title:	Inconsistent Use of .Concept Type.
Source: Mark H. Linehan, IBM, mlinehan@us.ibm.com

Summary:
Each kind of time point is a .concept type..  That is, the instances of each kind of time point are themselves concepts.

The specification is inconsistent about this.  Referring to the beta 2 document:

Figure 10.2 shows the following as <<concept type>> but the text does not:
calendar day
calendar week
calendar month
calendar year
Figure 11.1 and the associated text do not mark these concepts as .concept type., but should:
Gregorian day
Gregorian week
Gregorian month
Gregorian year
Figure 11.3 and the associated text do not mark these concepts as .concept type., but should:
common year
leap year
centennial year
quadricentennial year
Gregorian day of year
Gregorian day of month
Gregorian month of year
Figure 11.7 shows the following concepts that should be marked <<concept type>>
Gregorian year
Gregorian day
Figure 12.1 and the associated text do not mark these concepts as .concept type., but should:
calendar week
week of year
day of week
weekday of year
Figure 13.1 and the associated text do not mark these concepts as .concept type., but should:
hour of day
minute of day
second of day
leap second
minute of hour
second of minute
Figure 13.3 shows the following concepts that should be marked <<concept type>>
hour of day
minute of day
Figure 14.1 shows the following class .internet time point. that should be marked <<concept type>>, but that is missing from the text


Resolution:  
Revised Text: 
Disposition:	???