Issue 17581: Conformance point (uml25-ftf)
Source: THALES (Mr. Hugues Vincent, hugues.vincent(at)thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: Title: Conformance point
Where: section 2
Nature of Issue: Revision
Severity of Issue: Significant
Full Description of the Issue:
* Dependencies among conformance points are not stated in all the case. Particularly, when they are no dependency, this need to be pointed out. 
* I don't understand the last paragraph which seems nevertheless to open a door to the most permissive conformance point ever read: does that say that if a vendor don't want to do everything s/he just have to state so and this is good? As a UML tool users, I cannot imagine this.
* "Where the UML specification provides options for a conforming tool, these are explicitly stated in the specification": such options should also be gathered in this section for clearness.
* What is the status of the section 6 wrt conformance and particularly 6.3 about UML semantics? At least, add a reference to 6.3 in the "Semantic conformance" bullet and in section 6 specify which chapter is informative and which is normative
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 13, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 17581

Title: Conformance point
Where: section 2
Nature of Issue: Revision
Severity of Issue: Significant
Full Description of the Issue:
* Dependencies among conformance points are not stated in all the case. Particularly, when they are no dependency, this need to be pointed out. 
* I don't understand the last paragraph which seems nevertheless to open a door to the most permissive conformance point ever read: does that say that if a vendor don't want to do everything s/he just have to state so and this is good? As a UML tool users, I cannot imagine this.
* "Where the UML specification provides options for a conforming tool, these are explicitly stated in the specification": such options should also be gathered in this section for clearness.
* What is the status of the section 6 wrt conformance and particularly 6.3 about UML semantics? At least, add a reference to 6.3 in the "Semantic conformance" bullet and in section 6 specify which chapter is informative and which is normative