Issue 17598: "Influence" of measure relationship (smm-rtf)
Source: Cordys (Mr. Henk de Man, hdman(at)cordys.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Though, for MeasureRelationship in SMM,  the "real" influence of one measure to other measure(s) is implied by the type of measure, its functors, operations, accumulators, etc., still it is, for business analyst understanding and maintenance sake very useful to add the influence type explicitly (the analyst may even define it before the actual functor or operation is specified). This will also be helpful in diagrammatic understanding in one glance of how measurements are influencing each other. 


Resolution (as agreed with Larry Hines): 


Add optional property "Influence" to MeasureRelationship. This is property with enumeration type "Influence", having 2 enum values: "positive", "negative". 
In addition: a constraint, specifying that this property is not allowed for "EquivalentMeasureRelationship". 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 18, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

ogle-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :x-gm-message-state;
        bh=5INnkP+HgkK1CJMd/nVcYIjIap/NNpSX9FTaS7AZ/pU=;
        b=K1mUqekvSWqL27WCdYSssqcePM15qBIEb5Ada0oX/e81T/punk+uqLFJo312qNbC9V
         CIjC1LSqJ3p15e+xlGric4qSSatT3TzsRr46A0htz+3cVOpihzUMS1beeWIHPdVsvvSt
         zEhMJxCXIxQI0ntfEq97lohauKO7FXK7qjWgKdn2aTUn2utfuT1jIssgYtf5PhnQZ08e
         L29kXH02KQwwQv40DzntlhpzN3H0bmUe8WiiaI/zTAO80icWsPGiv0yjme0EAsBLerz1
         C6VHc6Jqo3CuljjRrIO5F8GEb/2doYBiDMOTCHbBlxX8pZjbjcbCAYHsKEVOkfzOBCTW
         fbrg==
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:39:34 +0200
Subject: SMM RTF issue: "Influence" of measure relationship
From: Henk de Man <hdman@cordys.com>
To: Juergen Boldt <juergen@omg.org>
Cc: Larry Hines <Larry.Hines@microfocus.com>,
        Arne Berre <Arne.J.Berre@sintef.no>, Henk de Man <hdman@cordys.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7yDo2DHEQsmYAmpoKUpUamL3b2PLT4UFwNCxDViwZ+yg8mIulgcAWE/qUFRqrLq8od1RY


Juergen,


Can you add this as new issue for SMM RTF: 


Issue:


Though, for MeasureRelationship in SMM,  the "real" influence of one measure to other measure(s) is implied by the type of measure, its functors, operations, accumulators, etc., still it is, for business analyst understanding and maintenance sake very useful to add the influence type explicitly (the analyst may even define it before the actual functor or operation is specified). This will also be helpful in diagrammatic understanding in one glance of how measurements are influencing each other. 


Resolution (as agreed with Larry Hines): 


Add optional property "Influence" to MeasureRelationship. This is property with enumeration type "Influence", having 2 enum values: "positive", "negative". 
In addition: a constraint, specifying that this property is not allowed for "EquivalentMeasureRelationship". 


Regards,


Henk de Man