Issue 17631: General comment: The text should be reviewed for clarity before it progresses to IS. (mof2core-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: The technical intent of the document is reasonably clear, and it appears to have been used for several effective implementations.  The presentation of the material in the document is a long way from the ISO/IEC format, which is permitted for the first version of a standard introduced by the JTC1 PAS process, but there are a number of places where small changes would bring it closer to what users of ISO/IEC standards usually expect.  There are also a number of places where the text is unclear or does not make obvious sense.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 24, 2012: received issue
April 6, 2015: closed issue
Discussion: 
Proposal is too imprecise to cause any direct action. However, the responses to all
the PAS Ballot Comments will in summary result in the requested document
improvements. No action for this particular issue required.
Disposition: Closed, no change
End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 17631

General comment: The text should be reviewed for clarity before it progresses to IS.

The technical intent of the document is reasonably clear, and it appears to have been used for several effective implementations.  The presentation of the material in the document is a long way from the ISO/IEC format, which is permitted for the first version of a standard introduced by the JTC1 PAS process, but there are a number of places where small changes would bring it closer to what users of ISO/IEC standards usually expect.  There are also a number of places where the text is unclear or does not make obvious sense.