Issue 17785: Clarification of imports (uml25-ftf)
Source: Lockheed Martin (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, michael_chonoles2(at)omg.org)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: Minor
Summary: Type: Clarification of imports
The following are not obvious: 
1) Can a non-package namespace, such as a class, have a package 
import relationship to a package? From the metamodel yes

2) Can a namespace, of any type,  do a element import of a package?
From the metamodel yes

3) Can a package do an element import of a attribute?
From the metamodel yes

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 25, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 17785

Problem: 7.017

Severity Minor
Type: Clarification of imports
The following are not obvious: 
1) Can a non-package namespace, such as a class, have a package 
import relationship to a package? From the metamodel yes
 
2) Can a namespace, of any type,  do a element import of a package?
From the metamodel yes
 
3) Can a package do an element import of a attribute?
From the metamodel yes
Source: Michael Jesse Chonoles
This is issue # 17785

Problem: 7.017

Severity Minor
Type: Clarification of imports
The following are not obvious: 
1) Can a non-package namespace, such as a class, have a package 
import relationship to a package? From the metamodel yes
 
2) Can a namespace, of any type,  do a element import of a package?
From the metamodel yes
 
3) Can a package do an element import of a attribute?
From the metamodel yes
Source: Michael Jesse Chonoles