Issue 17816: Optional String Multiplicity (uml25-ftf)
Source: Lockheed Martin (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, michael_chonoles2(at)omg.org)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: Significant
Summary: Why is the multiplicity for String include 0, but the multiplicities for the other literals do not? LiteralString should be as optional as LiteralBoolean
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 26, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 17816

Problem: 8.001

Level: Medium
Type: Inconsistency
Location:8.2.2 Abstract Syntax   p 75
Title: Optional String Multiplicity
 
Description:
 
Why is the multiplicity for String include 0, but the multiplicities for the other literals do not? LiteralString should be as optional as LiteralBoolean
 
Source: Michael Jesse Chonoles /Edward Willink