Issue 17899: What is “Intentionally Not specified”? (uml25-ftf)
Source: Soluta.net (Dr. Adriano Comai, acomai(at)soluta.net)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: current text: “A Property may be marked, via the property isID, as being (part of) the identifier (if any) for Classifiers of which it is a member. The interpretation of this is left open but this could be mapped to implementations such as primary keys for relational database tables or ID attributes in XML. If multiple Properties are marked (possibly...”

[AC] I would specify “are marked as isID (possibly…”

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 26, 2012: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 17899

Problem: 9.031

Severity: minor
Type: Clarification
Location: 9.5.3 p 121
Title: What is .Intentionally Not specified.?
current text: .A Property may be marked, via the property isID, as being (part of) the identifier (if any) for Classifiers of which it is a member. The interpretation of this is left open but this could be mapped to implementations such as primary keys for relational database tables or ID attributes in XML. If multiple Properties are marked (possibly....
 
[AC] I would specify .are marked as isID (possibly..
Source: Adriano Comai