Issue 17943: Location Figure 11-22 s p.216 - Title doesn’t match contents (uml25-ftf) Source: Lockheed Martin (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, michael_chonoles2(at)omg.org) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: Current text: Figure 11-22 InstanceSpecification describes the return value of an Operation The diagram doesn’t show this, it show a dependence on an instance, but not that this the return value of a particular operation. The relevant text, 11.4.4 Notation on page 213 says A usage dependency may relate an InstanceSpecification to a constructor for a Class, The diagram doesn’t connect the instance to the constructor, just to the class. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 27, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== s is issue # 17943 Problem: 11.010 Severity: Minor Type: Correction Location Figure 11-22 s p.216 Title: Title doesn.t match contents Current text: Figure 11-22 InstanceSpecification describes the return value of an Operation The diagram doesn.t show this, it show a dependence on an instance, but not that this the return value of a particular operation. The relevant text, 11.4.4 Notation on page 213 says A usage dependency may relate an InstanceSpecification to a constructor for a Class, The diagram doesn.t connect the instance to the constructor, just to the class. Source: Michael Jesse Chonoles From: Axel Scheithauer To: "uml25-ftf@omg.org" Subject: 17943 and 17944: Return type missing Thread-Topic: 17943 and 17944: Return type missing Thread-Index: Ac5ONgEqEwxFNvyfT6yAC4WdgQcbAg== Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 10:55:12 +0000 Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [80.171.22.172] X-XWALL-BCKS: auto X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAh15Qr0delmo X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Hi, In Ballot 5 two diagrams get improved, but there is still a problem left, although not mentioned in the issues: The spec says: A constructor is an Operation having a single return result parameter of the type of the owning Class, and marked with the standard stereotype «Create». But the makeWindow-Operation doesn.t have a return type. Shall I file an issue, or can it be resolved in this ballot? The diagrams for 17942 and 17944 also show small superfluous frames around all strings. Regards Axel From: Steve Cook To: Axel Scheithauer , "uml25-ftf@omg.org" Subject: RE: 17943 and 17944: Return type missing Thread-Topic: 17943 and 17944: Return type missing Thread-Index: Ac5ONgEqEwxFNvyfT6yAC4WdgQcbAgCTdvlA Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:21:17 +0000 Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.166.18.105] X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37;CTRY:US;IPV:CAL;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(199002)(189002)(74662001)(71186001)(31966008)(80022001)(74502001)(65816001)(16406001)(512954002)(6806003)(16236675002)(56816002)(51856001)(47446002)(17760045001)(56776001)(74876001)(55846006)(79102001)(74706001)(54316002)(76482001)(67866001)(47976001)(50986001)(53806001)(54356001)(4396001)(81342001)(81542001)(59766001)(74366001)(15202345002)(47736001)(63696002)(49866001)(46102001)(69226001)(20776003)(77982001)(33656001)(44976003)(66926002);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB014;H:TK5EX14HUBC105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com;RD:InfoDomainNonexistent;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com X-Forefront-PRVS: 084674B2CF X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org Axel Well spotted. I will draw a new diagram showing the return type. The superfluous frames are an editorial issue which will be fixed before publication. -- Steve From: Axel Scheithauer [mailto:Axel.Scheithauer@oose.de] Sent: 11 May 2013 11:55 To: uml25-ftf@omg.org Subject: 17943 and 17944: Return type missing Hi, In Ballot 5 two diagrams get improved, but there is still a problem left, although not mentioned in the issues: cid:image001.jpg@01CE508C.92DE0370 The spec says: A constructor is an Operation having a single return result parameter of the type of the owning Class, and marked with the standard stereotype «Create». But the makeWindow-Operation doesn.t have a return type. Shall I file an issue, or can it be resolved in this ballot? The diagrams for 17942 and 17944 also show small superfluous frames around all strings. Regards Axel