Issue 17976: Location: Page 328 Regions 14.2.3 - Text about regions without initial state (uml25-ftf) Source: oose Innovative Informatik GmbH (Mr. Axel Scheithauer, axel.scheithauer(at)oose.de) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: “No one approach is defined for the case when there is no initial Pseudostate exists within the Region.” Proposed Res “What it means if none is defined, is left to the modeler.” Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 27, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== s is issue # 17976 Problem: 14.005 Severity Minor Type Grammar Location: Page 328 Regions 14.2.3 Title: Text about regions without initial state .No one approach is defined for the case when there is no initial Pseudostate exists within the Region.. Proposed Res .What it means if none is defined, is left to the modeler.. Source: Axel Scheithauer DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=+Zqlt3ZA/Ij9+RTE06yhQL+x4gLgBbwaoJZZg66EiKI=; b=iPTJgnkl+5OTd9JX4zaloCc8e9cHoyJzzB89QrqLHI1lvlOO43rbv3LRxzlm4AniB0 rExnsV63Vyt6z0URdvHizZCQ5jlwKvztCF4a695S10ey8J8JpyjxjVZy3bpE+G7n9C/r y7gbKPCmMSaWX2oo+mZD2pw/Iufo0GxlJO6e396+W7jn+hYHEN8H4oSIyaBR+Hl+LxiH 6eYxk8E9ewrvGW5oRVxx/+VOPyl4foN+ZieGQKLnVNfnqOsMw6YoByKZGdo85uCoZPEq yv2u3tIs2CUguiY+SGinjGE4LksvfySMMdP0nybldwAg65Zyo2i2feLXQjlaJQTHvj9z yy3w== X-Received: by 10.182.123.76 with SMTP id ly12mr2193000obb.53.1364307843017; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: bran.selic@gmail.com From: Bran Selic Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:23:22 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: t3hMDhAbbZ0pFOF__zeZGIcOW4A Subject: Re: Ballot 3 proposal To: Steve Cook Cc: "uml25-ftf@omg.org" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Regarding the resolution for 17976, Axel, who raised the isue, explained to me that it was meant as a minor complaint about the English usage in the text. I had misunderstood it to be a complaint about the semantics, so the resolution gave a long explanation of why the issue is rejected. The English usage is a simple fix, although, I am thinking that, perhaps, the explanation I gave might be useful to include in the text. In any case, I suggest that we pull this one as well and leave it for the next ballot. Bran On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Steve Cook wrote: We.ve had some good feedback on Ballot 3. Responding to this feedback will mean making significant changes to some of the resolutions. I therefore propose that we amend Ballot 3 as follows and then let it go forwards to a vote. Delete the unnecessary .[. from the resolution of 17990. Change the replacement text in the resolution of 15371 to read as follows: .A package that contains model elements that are intended to be reused by other packages. It is analogous to a class library in some programming languages. The model library may not include instances of the metamodel extension metaclasses specified in Clause 12.3, such as Profiles and Stereotypes. However it may include ProfileApplications and stereotype applications, and a model library is often used in conjunction with an applied profile.. Withdraw the following resolutions from the ballot: From Steve: 15278 and 15279 (which are marked as dups of 15144, but 15144 was omitted from the review) 18124, 7426, 18117, 18147 (all merged into 18124 which needs correcting) 18454, 18113, 18114, 11683, 9125, 15756, 15419 (all merged into 18454 which needs correcting) 18112 (needs correcting) From Bran: 17977 (feedback from Dave and Conrad) 17985 (feedback from Dave and Conrad) 17984 (feedback from Conrad) This will leave 7411, 12839, 14552, 15280, 15371, 17931, 17932, 17936, 17990, 18444, 17976 to be voted on. Let.s discuss this proposal on our call today. -- Steve