Issue 17977: Location: Page 329 States - Stable (uml25-ftf) Source: Lockheed Martin (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, michael_chonoles2(at)omg.org) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: s the configuration stable if there is a pending deferred event that should be processed? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 27, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== s is issue # 17977 Problem: 14.009 Severity: Minor Nature: Clarification Location: Page 329 States. Title: Stable Is the configuration stable if there is a pending deferred event that should be processed? Source: Michael Jesse Chonoles Discussion Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:58:17 +0000 From: Dave Hawkins User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 To: "Manfred R. Koethe" CC: "uml25-ftf@omg.org" Subject: [UML 2.5 FTF] Ballot 3 - Preview 3 - Issue 17977 X-Source-IP: userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== The "or" in the sentence starting "Due to its..." shouldn't be in italics. It's a bit confusing to describe in transit in that paragraph, but then only discuss stable state configuration in a distant section without at least a reference. This is particularly so as the subsequent note: NOTE. A StateMachine execution may be executing Behaviors even when it has settled in a stable state configuration, in cases where there are doActivity Behaviors associated with its active state configuration. Refers to the as yet undefined stable state configuration. The paragraph to be inserted just seems to be restating a little more verbosely what already appears in the bullet points defining a stable state. Dave On 16/03/13 21:03, Manfred R. Koethe wrote: Dear Colleagues, Here is Preview 3 of Ballot 3. Issue 8274 and 17933 are withdrawn from this ballot. Kind regards, Manfred --------------------------------------------------------------- Manfred R. Koethe 88solutions Corporation tel: +1 (617) 848 0525 fax: +1 (815) 550 2086 mailto: koethe@88solutions.com web: http://www.88solutions.com --------(Model-Driven Modeling Solutions)-------- -- Dave Hawkins | Principal Software Engineer | +44 118 924 0022 Oracle JDeveloper Development Oracle Corporation UK Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. Company Reg. No. 1782505. Reg. office: Oracle Parkway, Thames Valley Park, Reading RG6 1RA. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=uyPG+G6Ux/8+csu6ngNG+hkrLAfpfFtQrxnDjufqhc0=; b=f+CQX1NwgdHJp7m7nbgPjroacBrttO8sw8Bw/sjr7C+Kg/JLrnb8RBNHFFLJrpeIYG TU6VLZEMBcY4MJZ/YES5Fba+fakiTS5pxyy0WhfEMXgCLTH93fmt7GpXGoyWmIzWm8fN Z2xv93fzgaRf86Cj1PxKxU+3BrkQtUOXZRgGzpKE5bsh2zR3fEbgxZNPrD+xVB0Pnh3E 2MdvA90pk+km1QKgV7Fcf937dWTkOPR0wY2Mh2nY1IDZqkjvXbV9dIizJ6L+J/XO0UKz QCx98U6YWzQkIGWn4Dg7PQBaftG5D0mqmJev1COQ/S7r31m1AeR5E1MOcDsaZgfXgQsS elyQ== X-Received: by 10.60.8.40 with SMTP id o8mr7268740oea.112.1363636544061; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: bran.selic@gmail.com From: Bran Selic Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:55:03 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KlHJo8-141AGKbrDfRGo48Qi2ec Subject: Re: [UML 2.5 FTF] Ballot 3 - Preview 3 - Issue 17977 To: Dave Hawkins Cc: "Manfred R. Koethe" , "uml25-ftf@omg.org" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Thanks for the feedback, Dave. I admit to struggling with this formulation. I will try to reformulate based on what you wrote. Some of this stuff is really tricky to present in a logical sequential order. Cheers...Bran On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Dave Hawkins wrote: The "or" in the sentence starting "Due to its..." shouldn't be in italics. It's a bit confusing to describe in transit in that paragraph, but then only discuss stable state configuration in a distant section without at least a reference. This is particularly so as the subsequent note: NOTE. A StateMachine execution may be executing Behaviors even when it has settled in a stable state configuration, in cases where there are doActivity Behaviors associated with its active state configuration. Refers to the as yet undefined stable state configuration. The paragraph to be inserted just seems to be restating a little more verbosely what already appears in the bullet points defining a stable state. Dave On 16/03/13 21:03, Manfred R. Koethe wrote: Dear Colleagues, Here is Preview 3 of Ballot 3. Issue 8274 and 17933 are withdrawn from this ballot. Kind regards, Manfred --------------------------------------------------------------- Manfred R. Koethe 88solutions Corporation tel: +1 (617) 848 0525 fax: +1 (815) 550 2086 mailto: koethe@88solutions.com web: http://www.88solutions.com --------(Model-Driven Modeling Solutions)-------- -- Dave Hawkins | Principal Software Engineer | +44 118 924 0022 Oracle JDeveloper Development Oracle Corporation UK Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. Company Reg. No. 1782505. Reg. office: Oracle Parkway, Thames Valley Park, Reading RG6 1RA.