Issue 17987: Location: Signal Receipt symbol (uml25-ftf) Source: Lockheed Martin (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, michael_chonoles2(at)omg.org) Nature: Enhancement Severity: Significant Summary: What is the motivation for the limitation on not have time events, or call events here Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 27, 2012: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== s is issue # 17987 Problem: 14.027 Severity: Medium Type: Enhancement Location: Signal Receipt symbol Title: What is the motivation for the limitation on not have time events, or call events here. Source: Michael Jesse Chonoles From: "Bock, Conrad" To: "uml25-ftf@omg.org" Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:07:44 -0400 Subject: RE: [UML 2.5 FTF] Ballot 4 -- Preview 3 --- PLEASE READ, 17987 Thread-Topic: [UML 2.5 FTF] Ballot 4 -- Preview 3 --- PLEASE READ, 17987 Thread-Index: Ac48Z91rNEMJI4aJShyR9cCsNM7yEw== Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAR15Qr0= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Bran, > I do not read 17984 or 17987 as feature requests. My comment about 17987 wasn't about whether it was a feature request. Conrad -----Original Message----- From: Bock, Conrad Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:25 PM To: 'Manfred R. Koethe'; uml25-ftf@omg.org Subject: RE: [UML 2.5 FTF] Ballot 4 -- Preview 3 --- PLEASE READ Manfred, et al, Here are comments on draft ballot 4. Conrad 8274 (Enumerations should not have attributes) In the revised text, the statement after the semicolon isn't about immutability, and the next sentence is, so the semicolon should be a period. 15339 (unique annotation) It's redundant to add "range" to multiplicity since the term "multiplicity" was introduced to distinguish the model element from the cardinality of the set/list of runtime values that the model element specifies. If you want to use "range", it would be "cardinality range". Typos: "ordered mean" => "unordered means" "unique unordered applies"=> "unique or unordered applies" (two occurrences) 16483 (Two Diagrams of Packages) The revised text should mention the right side of the figure (ii), like the existing text does. 17992 (State Configurations) In the last sentence of Revised Text, I think "entered" should be "exited". 18112 (Previously unmentioned constraints given in Keywords Annex) Since the first paragraph is removed, you can remoive "(i.e., reserved words)" from the first bullet. 18505 (Qualifiers) The revised text isn't following the font conventions, eg, for Association end "qualifiers". 17984 (State List Notations - Why must state lists be effect free) The discusison says "If such a capability is deemed useful, an explicit feature request issue should be raised", which is what this issue does. To close the issue, the discussion should explain why the capability is not being added. 17987 (Location: Signal Receipt symbol) It might help the filer to mention that Activities defines a time event receipt notation (hour glass).